Morph differences and honeybee morph preference in the distylous species Fagopyrum esculentum moench

被引:43
作者
Cawoy, Valerie
Deblauwe, Vincent
Halbrecq, Bertrand
Ledent, Jean-Francois
Kinet, Jean-Marie
Jacquemart, Anne-Laure
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, Unite Ecol & Biogeog, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Catholic Univ Louvain, Ctr Rech Biodivers, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Unite Biol Vegetale, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[4] Catholic Univ Louvain, Ins Sci Vie, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Catholic Univ Louvain, Fac Ingn Biol Agron & Environm, Unite Ecophysiol & Ameliorat Vegetale, B-1348 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
buckwheat; distyly; honeybees; morph differences; nectar; pollination; seed set;
D O I
10.1086/504924
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The relatively low reproductive success of buckwheat ( Fagopyrum esculentum Moench, Polygonaceae) is poorly understood. The question arises as to whether this distylous species is pollen or resource limited. We investigated the reproductive biology of buckwheat under controlled conditions in growth rooms and in the field in central Belgium in order to determine whether floral morph and pollination events may affect its reproductive success. In controlled conditions, flowering phenology and flower morphology of the two floral morphs did not differ. However, thrum flowers produced larger and fewer pollen grains and secreted more nectar, with a higher proportion of sucrose, than pin flowers. In the field, thrum flowers were preferentially visited by honeybees, but fewer pollen grains were deposited on their stigmas. However, numbers of pollen tubes growing in styles, seed set, and seed weight did not differ between morphs. Seed set was low under field conditions and did not increase after hand cross- pollinations, suggesting that there was no pollen limitation. These results indicate that factors other than floral morph or pollination events were governing female fertility in buckwheat.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 861
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   DIFFERENTIAL STAINING OF ABORTED AND NONABORTED POLLEN [J].
ALEXANDER, MP .
STAIN TECHNOLOGY, 1969, 44 (03) :117-+
[2]   Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences [J].
Ashman, TL ;
Knight, TM ;
Steets, JA ;
Amarasekare, P ;
Burd, M ;
Campbell, DR ;
Dudash, MR ;
Johnston, MO ;
Mazer, SJ ;
Mitchell, RJ ;
Morgan, MT ;
Wilson, WG .
ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (09) :2408-2421
[3]   Variation of pollen limitation in the early flowering Mediterranean geophyte Narcissus assoanus (Amaryllidaceae) [J].
Baker, AM ;
Barrett, SCH ;
Thompson, JD .
OECOLOGIA, 2000, 124 (04) :529-535
[4]  
Baker H.G., 1983, P117
[5]   The evolution of plant sexual diversity [J].
Barrett, SCH .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (04) :274-284
[6]  
BJORKMAN T, 1995, SEX PLANT REPROD, V8, P143, DOI 10.1007/BF00242258
[8]   POPULATION ECOLOGY OF HETEROSTYLE AND HOMOSTYLE PRIMULA-VULGARIS - GROWTH, SURVIVAL AND REPRODUCTION IN FIELD POPULATIONS [J].
BOYD, M ;
SILVERTOWN, J ;
TUCKER, C .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1990, 78 (03) :799-813
[9]   THE CONSEQUENCES OF SELF-POLLINATION IN ASCLEPIAS-EXALTATA, A SELF-INCOMPATIBLE MILKWEED [J].
BROYLES, SB ;
WYATT, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1993, 80 (01) :41-44
[10]   RESOURCE AND POLLEN LIMITATIONS TO LIFETIME SEED PRODUCTION IN A NATURAL PLANT-POPULATION [J].
CAMPBELL, DR ;
HALAMA, KJ .
ECOLOGY, 1993, 74 (04) :1043-1051