Socioemotional Wealth as a Mixed Gamble: Revisiting Family Firm R&D Investments With the Behavioral Agency Model

被引:398
作者
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. [1 ]
Campbell, Joanna Tochman [2 ]
Martin, Geoffrey [3 ]
Hoskisson, Robert E. [4 ]
Makri, Marianna [5 ]
Sirmon, David G. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Mendoza Coll Business, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Sam M Walton Coll Business, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[3] Melbourne Business Sch, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[4] Rice Univ, Jones Grad Sch Business, Houston, TX USA
[5] Univ Miami, Sch Business Adm, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Foster Sch Business, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY; OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE; RISK-TAKING; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1111/etap.12083
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Theoretical explanations for family firm underinvestment in R&D relative to nonfamily firms remain nascent. We revisit this question using a refinement to the behavioral agency model (BAM)the mixed gamblethat allows us to examine the socioemotional trade-offs that R&D represents for the family firm and how this differentiates their R&D investment decision from nonfamily firms. We do so in an empirical context where R&D investment is of greatest importancehigh-technology industries. Moreover, we examine three contingencies that allow us to explore heterogeneity across family firms in their R&D decisions due to their effect upon the family's socioemotional wealth mixed gamble: institutional investor ownership, related diversification, and performance hazard.
引用
收藏
页码:1351 / 1374
页数:24
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Social networking relationships, firm-specific managerial experience and firm performance in a transition economy: A comparative analysis of family owned and nonfamily firms [J].
Acquaah, Moses .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (10) :1215-1228
[2]   The other side of the trade-off: The impact of risk on executive compensation [J].
Aggarwal, RK ;
Samwick, AA .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1999, 107 (01) :65-105
[3]   Moving Beyond Schumpeter: Management Research on the Determinants of Technological Innovation [J].
Ahuja, Gautam ;
Lampert, Curba Morris ;
Tandon, Vivek .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2008, 2 :1-98
[4]   POWER, PERFORMANCE, AND SUCCESSION IN THE LARGE CORPORATION [J].
ALLEN, MP ;
PANIAN, SK .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1982, 27 (04) :538-547
[5]   Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification, and firm leverage [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 2003, 46 (02) :653-684
[6]   Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (03) :1301-1328
[7]   Agency costs and ownership structure [J].
Ang, JS ;
Cole, RA ;
Lin, JW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (01) :81-106
[8]  
[Anonymous], 14769 NAT BUR EC RES
[9]   Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation? [J].
Balkin, DB ;
Markman, GD ;
Gomez-Mejia, LR .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (06) :1118-1129
[10]   TOWARD A CONTINGENCY THEORY OF COMPENSATION STRATEGY [J].
BALKIN, DB ;
GOMEZMEJIA, LR .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1987, 8 (02) :169-182