The effect of the digestible undegradable protein concentration of concentrates and protein source offered to ewes in late pregnancy on colostrum production and lamb performance

被引:25
作者
Dawson, LER [1 ]
Carson, AF
Kilpatrick, DJ
机构
[1] Agr Res Inst No Ireland, Hillsborough BT26 6DR, Down, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Agr No Ireland, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
protein; ewes; pregnancy; colostrum;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00101-7
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
An experiment was carried out to determine the effect of level of digestible undegradable protein (DUP) concentration and source of protein offered to ewes in late pregnancy on subsequent colostrum production and lamb performance. Ninety-one twin-bearing ewes of mixed breeds were offered grass silage and one of six concentrate treatments for a period of 6 weeks prior to lambing. The concentrates were formulated to provide increasing levels of DUP from approximately 13-65 g DUP/kg DM. The DUP was supplied in the form of xylose-treated soyabean (soypass) or fishmeal. Silage was offered at a constant rate of approximately 0.5 kg dry matter per day. Protein source and DUP concentration of the concentrate had no significant effect (P>0.05) on ewe blood composition, colostrum yield and quality, lamb birth weight and lamb live weight gain from birth to weaning. The results of this study indicate that, for ewes with a mean condition score of 2.6 at 6 weeks prior to lambing and offered well fermented silage, protein source i.e., soypass versus fishmeal or level of DUP in the concentrate have no significant effect on ewe performance, in terms of colostrum production or lamb birth weight. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 36
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
*AFRC, 1990, EN NUTR ABSTR REV B, V60, P729
[2]  
*AGR RES COUNC, 1995, NUTR REQ RUM LIV
[4]  
BRAMBELL FWR, 1970, FRONT BIOL, V18, P166
[5]   THE EFFECT OF FEED-INTAKE AND BODY-WEIGHT ON PURINE DERIVATIVE EXCRETION AND MICROBIAL PROTEIN SUPPLY IN SHEEP [J].
CHEN, XB ;
CHEN, YK ;
FRANKLIN, MF ;
ORSKOV, ER ;
SHAND, WJ .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 70 (05) :1534-1542
[6]  
COFFEY KP, 1989, J ANIM SCI, V67, P1805
[7]   CONSIDERATION OF THE TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATION OF MILK-YIELD BY SUCKLED SHEEP AND A COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES OBTAINED BY 2 METHODS IN RELATION TO THE EFFECT OF BREED, LEVEL OF PRODUCTION AND STAGE OF LACTATION [J].
DONEY, JM ;
PEART, JN ;
SMITH, WF ;
LOUDA, F .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1979, 92 (FEB) :123-132
[8]  
FAHEY JL, 1965, J IMMUNOL, V94, P84
[9]  
*GAFTA, 1997, FARM GUID FISHM
[10]  
*HOUS LORDS, 1996, 80I HL