Treacle and Smallpox: Two Tests for Multicriteria Decision Analysis Models in Health Technology Assessment

被引:17
作者
Morton, Alec [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strathclyde, Sch Business, Dept Management Sci, Room 720,Sir William Duncan Wing,199 Cathedral St, Glasgow G4 0QU, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
decision analysis; health technology assessment; multicriteria decision analysis; preferential independence; PRACTICES TASK-FORCE; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; MEDICINES; EQUITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is rightly receiving increasing attention in health technology assessment. Nevertheless, a distinguishing feature of the health domain is that technologies must actually improve health, and good performance on other criteria cannot compensate for failure to do so. We argue for two reasonable tests for MCDA models: the treacle test (can a winning intervention be incompletely ineffective?) and the smallpox test (can a winning intervention be for a disease that no one suffers from?). We explore why models might fail such tests (as the models of some existing published studies would do) and offer some suggestions as to how practice should be improved.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 515
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Priority setting of health interventions: The need for multi-criteria decision analysis
    Baltussen R.
    Niessen L.
    [J]. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 4 (1)
  • [2] Priority Setting for Universal Health Coverage: We Need Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes, Not Just More Evidence on Cost-Effectiveness
    Baltussen, Rob
    Jansen, Maarten P.
    Mikkelsen, Evelinn
    Tromp, Noor
    Hontelez, Jan
    Bijlmakers, Leon
    Van der Wilt, Gert Jan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 5 (11) : 615 - 618
  • [3] Belton V., 2002, MULIPLE CRITERIA DEC
  • [4] Chongtrakul RP, 2005, ESSENT DRUGS MONIT, V34, P18
  • [5] Bridging Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and Efficient Health Care Decision Making with Multicriteria Decision Analysis (MCDA): Applying the EVIDEM Framework to Medicines Appraisal
    Goetghebeur, Mireille M.
    Wagner, Monika
    Khoury, Hanane
    Levitt, Randy J.
    Erickson, Lonny J.
    Rindress, Donna
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2012, 32 (02) : 376 - 388
  • [6] Venetian treacle and the foundation of medicines regulation
    Griffin, JP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2004, 58 (03) : 317 - 325
  • [7] Keeney RL, 1976, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences, and Value Tradeoffs
  • [8] Kusel J., 2015, VALUE OUTCOMES SPOTL, V1, P22
  • [9] Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making-Emerging Good Practices: Report 2 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force
    Marsh, Kevin
    IJzerman, Maarten
    Thokala, Praveen
    Baltussen, Rob
    Boysen, Meindert
    Kalo, Zoltan
    Lonngren, Thomas
    Mussen, Filip
    Peacock, Stuart
    Watkins, John
    Devlin, Nancy
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (02) : 125 - 137
  • [10] Assessing the Value of Healthcare Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Review of the Literature
    Marsh, Kevin
    Lanitis, Tereza
    Neasham, David
    Orfanos, Panagiotis
    Caro, Jaime
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (04) : 345 - 365