Spectral optimization for measuring electron density by the dual-energy computed tomography coupled with balanced filter method

被引:8
作者
Saito, Masatoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol Technol, Niigata 9518518, Japan
关键词
computerised tomography; diagnostic radiography; dosimetry; filtering theory; phantoms; radiation therapy; EFFECTIVE ATOMIC NUMBER; X-RAY CT; MAMMOGRAPHY; COMPUTATION; DETECTOR; SCATTER; SCANNER; PHANTOM;
D O I
10.1118/1.3157098
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has the potential for measuring electron density distribution in a human body to predict the range of particle beams for treatment planning in proton or heavy-ion radiotherapy. However, thus far, a practical dual-energy method that can be used to precisely determine electron density for treatment planning in particle radiotherapy has not been developed. In this article, another DECT technique involving a balanced filter method using a conventional x-ray tube is described. For the spectral optimization of DECT using balanced filters, the author calculates beam-hardening error and air kerma required to achieve a desired noise level in electron density and effective atomic number images of a cylindrical water phantom with 50 cm diameter. The calculation enables the selection of beam parameters such as tube voltage, balanced filter material, and its thickness. The optimized parameters were applied to cases with different phantom diameters ranging from 5 to 50 cm for the calculations. The author predicts that the optimal combination of tube voltages would be 80 and 140 kV with Tb/Hf and Bi/Mo filter pairs for the 50-cm-diameter water phantom. When a single phantom calibration at a diameter of 25 cm was employed to cover all phantom sizes, maximum absolute beam-hardening errors were 0.3% and 0.03% for electron density and effective atomic number, respectively, over a range of diameters of the water phantom. The beam-hardening errors were 1/10 or less as compared to those obtained by conventional DECT, although the dose was twice that of the conventional DECT case. From the viewpoint of beam hardening and the tube-loading efficiency, the present DECT using balanced filters would be significantly more effective in measuring the electron density than the conventional DECT. Nevertheless, further developments of low-exposure imaging technology should be necessary as well as x-ray tubes with higher outputs to apply DECT coupled with the balanced filter method for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:3631 / 3642
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Dual-energy CT-based material extraction for tissue segmentation in Monte Carlo dose calculations [J].
Bazalova, Magdalena ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (09) :2439-2456
[2]  
Berger M.J., 1987, XCOM: Photon Cross Sections on A National Bureau of Standards
[3]   COMPUTATION OF BREMSSTRAHLUNG X-RAY-SPECTRA AND COMPARISON WITH SPECTRA MEASURED WITH A GE(LI) DETECTOR [J].
BIRCH, R ;
MARSHALL, M .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1979, 24 (03) :505-517
[4]   AN ELECTRON-DENSITY CALIBRATION PHANTOM FOR CT-BASED TREATMENT PLANNING COMPUTERS [J].
CONSTANTINOU, C ;
HARRINGTON, JC ;
DEWERD, LA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 19 (02) :325-327
[5]  
Cranley K., 1997, CATALOGUE DIAGNOSTIC
[6]   X-RAY ATTENUATION COEFFICIENTS OF ELEMENTS AND MIXTURES [J].
JACKSON, DF ;
HAWKES, DJ .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1981, 70 (03) :169-233
[7]  
Kalender W.A., 2005, COMPUT TOMOGR, V2nd
[8]   Intensity distribution and impact of scatter for dual-source CT [J].
Kyriakou, Yiannis ;
Kalender, Willi A. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (23) :6969-6989
[9]   EFFECTIVE ATOMIC NUMBER AND ELECTRON-DENSITY AS MEASURED WITH A COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER - COMPUTATION AND CORRELATION WITH BRAIN TUMOR HISTOLOGY [J].
LATCHAW, RE ;
PAYNE, JT ;
GOLD, LHA .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1978, 2 (02) :199-208
[10]   A dual-energy subtraction technique for microcalcification imaging in digital mammography - A signal-to-noise analysis [J].
Lemacks, MR ;
Kappadath, SC ;
Shaw, CC ;
Liu, XM ;
Whitman, GJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (08) :1739-1751