Cefazolin prophylaxis in spine surgery: patients are frequently underdosed and at increased risk for infection

被引:9
|
作者
Karamian, Brian A. [1 ]
Toci, Gregory R. [1 ]
Lambrechts, Mark J. [1 ]
Siegel, Nicholas [1 ]
Sherman, Matthew [1 ]
Canseco, Jose A. [1 ]
Hilibrand, Alan S. [1 ]
Kepler, Christopher K. [1 ]
Vaccaro, Alexander R. [1 ]
Schroeder, Gregory D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Inst, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
SPINE JOURNAL | 2022年 / 22卷 / 09期
关键词
Cefazolin; Cervical; Clinical outcomes; Dosing by weight; Infection rate; Lumbar; Perioperative antibiotics; Spine surgery; Surgical site infection; SURGICAL SITE INFECTION; BODY-MASS INDEX; INTRAWOUND VANCOMYCIN POWDER; ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS; ANTIMICROBIAL-PROPHYLAXIS; LUMBAR FUSION; PREVENTION; GUIDELINES; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spinee.2022.05.018
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Perioperative antibiotics are critical in reducing the risk of postoperative spine infections. However, the efficacy and optimal weight-based prophylactic cefazolin dosing is unclear. PURPOSE: To determine (1) if inadequate weight-based prophylactic dosing of cefazolin affects infection rates after spinal fusions, and (2) identify the optimal dosing of cefazolin. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Single center retrospective cohort PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing posterior cervical or lumbar spinal fusion between January 2000 and October 2020 OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative surgical site infection status METHODS: Patients were grouped based on our institutionally derived dosing adequacy standards, 1 g for < 60 kg, 2 g for 60 to 120 kg, and 3 g for > 120 kg. Univariate comparisons and multivariate regressions identified the effect of inadequate dosing on infection rate. Patients were subsequently regrouped into cefazolin dose (grams) administered and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were compiled to determine the probability of infection based on cefazolin dose and patient weight. Alpha was set at 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 2,643 patients met inclusion criteria and 95 infections (3.6%) were identified. The infection rate was higher in the inadequate dosing group (5.86% vs. 2.58%, p<. 001). Adequate dosing was a predictor of decreased infections after lumbar fusion (OR: 0.43, p<.001), but not posterior cervical fusions (OR: 0.47, p=.065). Patients were subsequently regrouped into 1 g or 2 g of cefazolin administered resulting in a 5.01% and 2.77% infection rate, respectively (p=.005). The area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval for one (0.850 [0.777-0.924]) and two (0.575 [0.493-0.657]) g of cefazolin demonstrated lower infection rates for patients given 2 g cefazolin. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving an inadequate weight-based dose of preoperative cefazolin had an increased risk of infection following spinal fusion surgery. Two grams prophylactic cefazolin significantly reduces the likelihood of infection. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1442 / 1450
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Infection in Cancer Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery
    Morais Tavares-Junior, Mauro Costa
    Delgado Cabrera, Gabriela Estefania
    Jacobsen Teixeira, William Gemio
    Narazaki, Douglas Kenji
    Ghilardi, Cesar Salge
    Marcon, Raphael Martus
    Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca
    Pessoa De Barros-Filho, Tarcisio Eloy
    CLINICS, 2021, 76
  • [22] Increased Risk of Nocardia Infection with Atovaquone Prophylaxis in Cardiac Transplant Patients: A Critical Analysis
    Robbins, A.
    Conway, J.
    Singh, R.
    Cole, R.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 43 (04): : S452 - S452
  • [23] Ertapenem Prophylaxis Associated With an Increased Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection Among Surgical Patients
    Lee, Seungwon
    Prasad, Priya
    Lin, Matthew
    Garritson, Susan
    Nichols, Amy
    Liu, Catherine
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 36 (11): : 1351 - 1354
  • [24] The role of Cefazolin in prophylaxis of central vein catheter-related infection in dialysis patients
    Ghazimoghaddam, Behrouz
    Ghazimoghaddam, Koosha
    Besharat, Sima
    Rajabli, Majidreza
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 27 (05) : 1073 - 1075
  • [26] Risk factors and pharmacologic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in elective spine surgery
    McLynn, Ryan P.
    Diaz-Collado, Pablo J.
    Ottesen, Taylor D.
    Ondeck, Nathaniel T.
    Cui, Jonathan J.
    Bovonratwet, Patawut
    Shultz, Blake N.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 18 (06): : 970 - 978
  • [27] Risk factor for infection in spine surgery: Are the results correct?
    Alejandro Garcia, Jonny
    Del Castillo, Alejandra
    Hernandez Vargas, Juan Camilo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2018, 46 (08) : 958 - 959
  • [28] Surgical Site Infection in Spine Surgery: Who Is at Risk?
    Yao, Reina
    Zhou, Hanbing
    Choma, Theodore J.
    Kwon, Brian K.
    Street, John
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 : 5S - 30S
  • [29] Increased bleeding risk with enoxaparin venothromboembolism prophylaxis compared with heparin in patients undergoing bariatric surgery
    Audra J. Reiter
    Joanne Prinz
    Yan Li
    Alexander P. Nagle
    Eric S. Hungness
    Ezra N. Teitelbaum
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 6983 - 6988
  • [30] Increased bleeding risk with enoxaparin venothromboembolism prophylaxis compared with heparin in patients undergoing bariatric surgery
    Reiter, Audra J.
    Prinz, Joanne
    Li, Yan
    Nagle, Alexander P.
    Hungness, Eric S.
    Teitelbaum, Ezra N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (09): : 6983 - 6988