What's wrong with heritage experts? An interdisciplinary discussion of experts and expertise in heritage studies

被引:25
作者
Holleland, Herdis [1 ]
Skrede, Joar [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Cultural Heritage Res, Dept Heritage & Soc, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Heritage experts; expertise; non-experts; democratic involvement; liberal democracies; studying up; WORLD HERITAGE; POLITICS; KAKADU; ANTHROPOLOGY; DELIBERATION; CONVENTION; IDENTITIES; QUESTION; BREXIT; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/13527258.2018.1552613
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The role of heritage experts has become a prominent topic in the heritage studies literature. Proclaiming that 'we are all heritage experts', one of the striking features of the interest in experts within the heritage literature is the tendency to confine the discussion to the issue area of heritage, rather than situating it within the wider multidisciplinary discussion on the role of experts in modern democratic societies. Taking inspiration for the burgeoning multidisciplinary literature on experts, this paper is an attempt to theorise more fully the role of heritage experts in liberal democracies. This discussion leads to an acknowledgement that we are not all heritage experts in a narrow sense of the term. We need heritage experts, in the same way as we need other forms of expertise in modern societies characterised by a division of labour. This implies expanding the emerging interest for 'studying up' and carrying out more research on the political dimension of heritage.
引用
收藏
页码:825 / 836
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Abbott Andrew., 2014, SYSTEM PROFESSIONS E
  • [2] [Anonymous], EXPERT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1893, DIVISION LABOUR SOC
  • [4] [Anonymous], G WRIGHT FORUM
  • [5] [Anonymous], INT J CULT POLICY
  • [6] [Anonymous], FUNDING MATTERS ARCH
  • [7] [Anonymous], INT PRACTICES CAMBRI
  • [8] [Anonymous], KUNSTEN BEVARE KULTU
  • [9] [Anonymous], EASA SERIES
  • [10] Kakadu National Park World Heritage Site: Deconstructing the Debate, 1997-2003
    Aplin, Graeme
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN GEOGRAPHICAL STUDIES, 2004, 42 (02): : 152 - 174