Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Daily Administered GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom

被引:17
|
作者
Hunt, Barnaby [1 ]
Ye, Qing [2 ]
Valentine, William J. [1 ]
Ashley, Donna [3 ]
机构
[1] Ossian Hlth Econ & Commun, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Novo Nordisk AS, Soborg, Denmark
[3] Novo Nordisk Ltd, Gatwick, England
关键词
Cost; Cost-effectiveness; Diabetes mellitus; Exenatide; GLP-1 receptor agonist; Liraglutide; Lixisenatide; INSULIN GLARGINE; EXENATIDE TWICE; OPEN-LABEL; MULTIFACTORIAL INTERVENTION; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; UTILITY VALUES; PARALLEL-GROUP; ADD-ON; LIRAGLUTIDE; METFORMIN;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-016-0219-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist class has grown in the last decade, with several agents available in the UK. However there is currently a paucity of evidence regarding the relative cost-effectiveness of liraglutide 1.2 mg versus other daily administered GLP-1 receptor agonists, due to a lack of head-to-head trial data. Therefore the present analysis was performed, using results from a network meta-analysis (NMA), to compare the cost-effectiveness of three currently available daily administered GLP-1 receptor agonists for treatment of diabetes in the UK setting. Methods: A validated and published diabetes model was used to make long-term projections of clinical outcomes and direct costs (2015 GBP) for patients receiving liraglutide 1.2 mg once-daily, exenatide 10 lg twice daily and lixisenatide 20 lg once-daily. Treatment effects were taken from an NMA evaluating the efficacy of GLP-1 receptor agonists and were applied in a cohort based on the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes 6 (LEAD-6) trial. Costs and utilities were based on published sources. Results: Liraglutide 1.2 mg was associated with improved quality-adjusted life expectancy versus exenatide [9.19 versus 9.17 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)] and lixisenatide (9.19 versus 9.12 QALYs). Improvements were driven by benefits in glycemic control, leading to a reduced incidence of diabetes-related complications. Liraglutide 1.2 mg was associated with reduced costs versus exenatide (GBP 36,394 versus GBP 36,547) and lixisenatide (GBP 36,394 versus GBP 36,496), with cost savings as a result of complications avoided entirely offsetting increased acquisition costs. Based on the projected outcomes, liraglutide was found to be dominant over both exenatide and lixisenatide. Conclusion: Liraglutide 1.2 mg is likely to be considered cost-effective versus alternative daily administered GLP-1 receptor agonists for treatment of type 2 diabetes in the UK.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 147
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of Daily Administered GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in the United Kingdom
    Barnaby Hunt
    Qing Ye
    William J. Valentine
    Donna Ashley
    Diabetes Therapy, 2017, 8 : 129 - 147
  • [2] EVALUATING THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS FOR THE TREATMENT OF TYPE 2 DIABETES IN THE UK
    Ashley, D.
    Vega, G.
    Hunt, B.
    Valentine, W. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A606 - A606
  • [3] Long-term Cost-effectiveness of Two GLP-1 Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Italian Setting: Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide
    Hunt, Barnaby
    Kragh, Nana
    McConnachie, Ceilidh C.
    Valentine, William J.
    Rossi, Maria C.
    Montagnoli, Roberta
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 39 (07) : 1347 - 1359
  • [4] Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain
    Mezquita-Raya, Pedro
    Ramirez de Arellano, Antonio
    Kragh, Nana
    Vega-Hernandez, Gabriela
    Pohlmann, Johannes
    Valentine, William J.
    Hunt, Barnaby
    DIABETES THERAPY, 2017, 8 (02) : 401 - 415
  • [5] Liraglutide Versus Lixisenatide: Long-Term Cost-Effectiveness of GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Therapy for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Spain
    Pedro Mezquita-Raya
    Antonio Ramírez de Arellano
    Nana Kragh
    Gabriela Vega-Hernandez
    Johannes Pöhlmann
    William J. Valentine
    Barnaby Hunt
    Diabetes Therapy, 2017, 8 : 401 - 415
  • [6] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Exenatide versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Margarita Capel
    Andreea Ciudin
    María Mareque
    Raquel María Rodríguez-Rincón
    Susana Simón
    Itziar Oyagüez
    PharmacoEconomics - Open, 2020, 4 : 277 - 286
  • [7] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Exenatide versus GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
    Capel, Margarita
    Ciudin, Andreea
    Mareque, Maria
    Maria Rodriguez-Rincon, Raquel
    Simon, Susana
    Oyaguez, Itziar
    PHARMACOECONOMICS-OPEN, 2020, 4 (02) : 277 - 286
  • [8] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF EXENATIDE VERSUS GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS IN PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS
    Capel, M.
    Ciudin, A.
    Mareque, M.
    Rodriguez, R. M.
    Oyaguez, I
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S129 - S129
  • [9] The GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Are Cost-Effective for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes
    Plodkowski, Raymond
    AMERICAN HEALTH AND DRUG BENEFITS, 2017, 10 (04): : 187 - 188
  • [10] GLP-1 receptor agonists for type 2 diabetes
    De Block, Christophe E. M.
    Van Gaal, Luc F.
    LANCET, 2009, 374 (9683): : 4 - 6