Cross-country findings on tacit knowledge sharing: evidence from the Brazilian and Indonesian IT workers

被引:58
作者
Borges, Renata [1 ]
Bernardi, Monica [1 ]
Petrin, Renata [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Dept Management, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Information technology; Organizational culture; Cross cultural studies; Tacit knowledge; Knowledge sharing; Organizational commitment; ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE; PERSONALITY-TRAITS; AFFECTIVE COMMITMENT; JOB-SATISFACTION; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; ANTECEDENTS; MODERATOR; NETWORKS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1108/JKM-04-2018-0234
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to compare the factors that can influence the tacit knowledge sharing (KS) in two different cultures by investigating information technology professionals (IT) in Brazil and Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach A survey method was used and a standard questionnaire was applied. The sample size comprised 115 respondents from Brazil and 86 participants from Indonesia. A partial least squares analysis was used to assess the structural and confirmatory models and test the hypotheses. Findings The results indicate that, in both cultures, IT workers who are committed to the organization are more likely to engage in tacit KS behavior. Similarly, strong social ties play an important role in the willingness to share tacit knowledge. Also, there are major differences between the organizational cultures; for instance, whereas Brazilians seem to be influenced by team-oriented cultures, Indonesians seem to be indifferent. Research limitations/implications Limitations include the small sample size as only two cultures were chosen to assess the differences and the representation of just one professional category (IT). Originality/value This paper provides theoretical contributions as the literature lacks a macro-level analysis on the KS comparison between countries. The results advance the comprehension of tacit KS phenomenon by testing in a cross-country comparison the mediation effect of organizational commitment. To practitioners, this research presents important empirical contributions indicating how organizational culture, social environment, personality traits and employee commitment impact an individual's willingness to share tacit knowledge with their coworkers.
引用
收藏
页码:742 / 762
页数:21
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Positioning organisational culture in knowledge management research [J].
Al Saifi, Said Abdullah .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 19 (02) :164-189
[2]   Review:: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems:: Conceptual foundations and research issues [J].
Alavi, M ;
Leidner, DE .
MIS QUARTERLY, 2001, 25 (01) :107-136
[3]   Determinants of knowledge sharing in a public sector organization [J].
Amayah, Angela Titi .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 17 (03) :454-471
[4]   Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters [J].
Asheim, BT ;
Coenen, L .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2005, 34 (08) :1173-1190
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]   Self-monitoring as a moderator of the relationships between personality traits and performance [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Parks, L ;
Mount, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 58 (03) :745-767
[7]   Trustworthiness, risk, and the transfer of tacit and explicit knowledge between alliance partners [J].
Becerra, Manuel ;
Lunnan, Randi ;
Huemer, Lars .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2008, 45 (04) :691-713
[8]  
Borges R., 2016, Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, V16, P509
[9]   Tacit knowledge sharing between IT workers The role of organizational culture, personality, and social environment [J].
Borges, Renata .
MANAGEMENT RESEARCH REVIEW, 2013, 36 (01) :89-108
[10]   Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing [J].
Cabrera, A ;
Collins, WC ;
Salgado, JF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2006, 17 (02) :245-264