Towards an integrated flood management approach to address trade-offs between ecosystem services: Insights from the Dutch and German Rhine, Hungarian Tisza, and Chinese Yangtze basins

被引:23
作者
Halbe, Johannes [1 ]
Knueppe, Kathrin [1 ]
Knieper, Christian [1 ]
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Osnabruck, Inst Environm Syst Res, Barbarastr 12,Postfach 44 69, D-49069 Osnabruck, Germany
关键词
Flood management; Ecosystem services; Paradigms; Institutional analysis; WATER GOVERNANCE; RISK-MANAGEMENT; RIVER-BASIN; NETHERLANDS; EXPERIENCES; TRANSITION; PROTECTION; DYNAMICS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.001
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The utilization of ecosystem services in flood management is challenged by the complexity of human nature interactions and practical implementation barriers towards more ecosystem-based solutions, such as riverine urban areas or technical infrastructure. This paper analyses how flood management has dealt with trade-offs between ecosystem services and practical constrains towards more ecosystem-based solutions. To this end, we study the evolution of flood management in four case studies in the Dutch and German Rhine, the Hungarian Tisza, and the Chinese Yangtze basins during the last decades, focusing on the development and implementation of institutions and their link to ecosystem services. The complexity of human-nature interactions is addressed by exploring the impacts on ecosystem services through the lens of three management paradigms: (1) the control paradigm, (2) the ecosystem-based paradigm, and (3) the stakeholder involvement paradigm. Case study data from expert interviews and a literature search were structured using a database approach prior to qualitative interpretation. Results show the growing importance of the ecosystem-based and stakeholder involvement paradigms which has led to the consideration of a range of regulating and cultural ecosystem services that had previously been neglected. We detected a trend in flood management practice towards the combination of the different paradigms under the umbrella of integrated flood management, which aims at finding the most suitable solution depending on the respective regional conditions. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:984 / 994
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]  
ICPR [International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine], 2015, INT KOORD BEW 2015 I
[22]   Evolutionary systemic modelling of practices on flood risk [J].
Khatibi, Rahman .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2011, 401 (1-2) :36-52
[23]   Analysing water governance in heterogeneous case studies-Experiences with a database approach [J].
Knieper, C. ;
Holtz, G. ;
Kastens, B. ;
Pahl-Wostl, C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2010, 13 (07) :592-603
[24]   The governance of ecosystem services in river basins: An approach for structured data representation and analysis [J].
Knueppe, Kathrin ;
Knieper, Christian .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 66 :31-39
[25]  
MWR (Ministry of Water Resources], WAT RES MAN PROT CHI
[26]  
NABU, 2010, FLUSS URB RAUM POT F
[27]   Disentangling Puzzles of Spatial Scales and Participation in Environmental Governance-The Case of Governance Re-scaling Through the European Water Framework Directive [J].
Newig, Jens ;
Schulz, Daniel ;
Jager, Nicolas W. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 58 (06) :998-1014
[28]  
Ostrom E, 2005, UNDERSTANDING INSTITUTIONAL DIVERSITY, P1
[29]  
OVF [General Directorate of Water Management], 2014, SUMM HUNG GEN DIR WA
[30]   How Multilevel Societal Learning Processes Facilitate Transformative Change: A Comparative Case Study Analysis on Flood Management [J].
Pahl-Wostl, Claudia ;
Becker, Gert ;
Knieper, Christian ;
Sendzimir, Jan .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (04)