18F-FLT and 18F-FDOPA PET kinetics in recurrent brain tumors

被引:34
|
作者
Wardak, Mirwais [1 ]
Schiepers, Christiaan [1 ]
Cloughesy, Timothy F. [2 ]
Dahlbom, Magnus [1 ]
Phelps, Michael E. [1 ]
Huang, Sung-Cheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Mol & Med Pharmacol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Neurol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Positron emission tomography; F-18-FLT; F-18-FDOPA; Recurrent glioma; Tracer kinetic modeling; Multiple linear regression; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING PROLIFERATION; ORGAN STRUCTURES; METABOLIC-RATE; IN-VIVO; GRADE; RECONSTRUCTION; DELINEATION; VALIDATION; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-013-2678-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose In this study, kinetic parameters of the cellular proliferation tracer F-18-3'-deoxy-3'-fluoro-L-thymidine (FLT) and the amino acid probe 3,4-dihydroxy-6-F-18-fluoro-L-phenylalanine (FDOPA) were measured before and early after the start of therapy, and were used to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with recurrent malignant glioma using multiple linear regression (MLR) analysis. Methods High-grade recurrent brain tumors in 21 patients (11 men and 10 women, age range 26 - 76 years) were investigated. Each patient had three dynamic PET studies with each probe: at baseline and after 2 and 6 weeks from the start of treatment. Treatment consisted of biweekly cycles of bevacizumab (an angiogenesis inhibitor) and irinotecan (a chemotherapeutic agent). For each study, about 3.5 mCi of FLT (or FDOPA) was administered intravenously and dynamic PET images were acquired for 1 h (or 35 min for FDOPA). A total of 126 PET scans were analyzed. A three-compartment, two-tissue model was applied to estimate tumor FLT and FDOPA kinetic rate constants using ametabolite-and partial volume-corrected input function. MLR analysis was used to model OS as a function of FLT and FDOPA kinetic parameters for each of the three studies as well as their relative changes between studies. An exhaustive search of MLR models using three or fewer predictor variables was performed to find the best models. Results Kinetic parameters from FLT were more predictive of OS than those from FDOPA. The three-predictor MLR model derived using information from both probes (adjusted R-2= 0.83) fitted the OS data better than that derived using information from FDOPA alone (adjusted R-2=0.41), but was only marginally different from that derived using information from FLT alone (adjusted R-2=0.82). Standardized uptake values (either from FLT alone, FDOPA alone, or both together) gave inferior predictive results (best adjusted R-2=0.25). Conclusion For recurrent malignant glioma treated with bevacizumab and irinotecan, FLT kinetic parameters obtained early after the start of treatment (absolute values and their associated changes) can provide sufficient information to predict OS with reasonable confidence using MLR. The slight increase in accuracy for predicting OS with a combination of FLT and FDOPA PET information may not warrant the additional acquisition of FDOPA PET for therapy monitoring in patients with recurrent glioma.
引用
收藏
页码:1199 / 1209
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 18F-FLT    and 18F-FDOPA PET kinetics in recurrent brain tumors
    Mirwais Wardak
    Christiaan Schiepers
    Timothy F. Cloughesy
    Magnus Dahlbom
    Michael E. Phelps
    Sung-Cheng Huang
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2014, 41 : 1199 - 1209
  • [2] 18F-FDOPA kinetics in brain tumors
    Schiepers, Christiaan
    Chen, Wei
    Cloughesy, Timothy
    Dahlbom, Magnus
    Huang, Sung-Cheng
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2007, 48 (10) : 1651 - 1661
  • [3] 18F-FLT FOR PET IMAGING OF BRAIN TUMORS IN CHILDREN
    Robison, Nathan
    Grant, Frederick
    Treves, S. Ted
    Bandopadhayay, Pratiti
    Manley, Peter
    Chi, Susan
    Zimmerman, Mary Ann
    Chordas, Christine
    Goumnerova, Liliana
    Smith, Edward
    Scott, Michael
    Ullrich, Nicole J.
    Poussaint, Tina
    Kieran, Mark
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 : 144 - 144
  • [4] 18F-FDOPA PET and Detection of Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Kauhanen, S.
    Seppanen, M. P.
    Minn, H.
    Valimaki, M.
    Sane, T.
    Korsoff, P.
    Saltevo, J.
    Salmela, P.
    Ovaska, J.
    Nuutila, P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 : S146 - S147
  • [5] Uptake of 18F-FDOPA in the heart muscle of normal humans in 18F-FDOPA PET
    Kato, K.
    Abe, S.
    Odagawa, T.
    Niwa, A.
    Fujita, Y.
    Naganawa, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 : S447 - S448
  • [6] Imaging of advanced neuroendocrine tumors with 18F-FDOPA PET
    Becherer, A
    Szabó, M
    Karanikas, G
    Wunderbaldinger, P
    Angelberger, P
    Raderer, M
    Kurtaran, A
    Dudczak, R
    Kletter, K
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2004, 45 (07) : 1161 - 1167
  • [7] Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET:: Comparison with 18F-FDG
    Chen, W
    Cloughesy, T
    Kamdar, N
    Satyamurthy, N
    Bergsneider, M
    Liau, L
    Mischel, P
    Czernin, J
    Phelps, ME
    Silverman, DHS
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2005, 46 (06) : 945 - 952
  • [8] Characterization of Neuroblastic Tumors Using 18F-FDOPA PET
    Lu, Meng-Yao
    Liu, Yen-Lin
    Chang, Hsiu-Hao
    Jou, Shiann-Tarng
    Yang, Yung-Li
    Lin, Kai-Hsin
    Lin, Dong-Tsamn
    Lee, Ya-Ling
    Lee, Hsinyu
    Wu, Pei-Yi
    Luo, Tsai-Yueh
    Shen, Lie-Hang
    Huang, Shiu-Feng
    Liao, Yung-Feng
    Hsu, Wen-Ming
    Tzen, Kai-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 54 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [9] Quantification methods comparison in brain 18F-FDOPA PET
    Arena, Julieta E.
    Urrutia, Leandro
    Falasco, German
    Ponce de Leon, Magdalena
    Vazquez, Silvia
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2019, 9 (06): : 274 - 281
  • [10] 18F-FDOPA PET and Glioblastoma Recurrence
    不详
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2014, 55 (02) : 19N - 19N