X-ray tube voltage and image quality in adult and pediatric CT

被引:0
作者
Huda, W. [1 ]
Ogden, K. M. [1 ]
Scalzetti, E. M. [1 ]
Lavallee, R. L. [1 ]
Samei, E. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Upstate Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2006: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3 | 2006年 / 6142卷
关键词
CT; image quality; contrast to noise ratio; pediatric patient; x-ray tube voltage; optimization;
D O I
10.1117/12.649279
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate how tissue x-ray attenuation coefficients, and their uncertainties, vary with x-ray tube voltage in different sized patients. Anthropomorphic phantoms (newborn, 10 year old, adult) were scanned a GE LightSpeed scanner at four x-ray tube voltages. Measurements were made of tissue attenuation in the head, chest and abdomen regions, as well as the corresponding noise values. Tissue signal to noise ratios (SNR) were obtained by dividing the average attenuation coefficient by the corresponding standard deviation. Soft tissue attenuation coefficients, relative to water, showed little variation with patient location or x-ray voltage (< 0.5%), but increasing the x-ray tube voltage from 80 to 140 kV reduced bone x-ray attenuation by similar to 14%. All tissues except adult bone showed a reduction of noise with increasing x-ray tube voltage (kV); the noise was found to be proportional to kV(n) and the average value of n for all tissues was -1.19 +/- 0.57. In pediatric patients at a constant x-ray tube voltage, SNR values were approximately independent of the body region, but the adult abdomen soft tissue SNR values were similar to 40% lower than the adult head. SNR values in the newborn were more than double the corresponding SNR soft tissue values in adults. SNR values for lung and bone were generally lower than those for soft tissues. For soft tissues, increasing the x-ray tube voltage from 80 to 140 kV increased the SNR by an average of similar to 90%. Data in this paper can be used to help design CT imaging protocols that take into account patient size and diagnostic imaging task.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
*ACR, 2001, MAGN RES IM MRI QUAL
[2]   The Rose model, revisited [J].
Burgess, AE .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1999, 16 (03) :633-646
[3]  
Bushberg JT., ESSENTIAL PHYS MED I, P359
[4]   Radiation dose reduction without degradation of low-contrast detectability at abdominal multisection CT with a low-tube voltage technique: Phantom study [J].
Funama, Y ;
Awai, K ;
Nakayama, Y ;
Kakei, K ;
Nagasue, N ;
Shimamura, M ;
Sato, N ;
Sultana, S ;
Morishita, S ;
Yamashita, Y .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) :905-910
[5]   Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT [J].
Huda, W ;
Scalzetti, EM ;
Levin, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (02) :430-435
[6]  
HUDA W, 2006, UNPUB RADIOLOGY
[7]  
ICRU, 1996, 54 ICRU
[8]   LESION CONSPICUITY, STRUCTURED NOISE, AND FILM READER ERROR [J].
KUNDEL, HL ;
REVESZ, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1976, 126 (06) :1233-1238
[9]  
MAYO JR, 1996, SPIRAL CT CHEST, P36
[10]   Automatic exposure control in CT: Are we done yet? [J].
McCollough, CH .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) :755-756