Multiple parameter regularization: numerical solutions and applications to the determination of geopotential from precise satellite orbits

被引:52
作者
Xu, PL [1 ]
Fukuda, Y
Liu, YM
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Kyoto 6110011, Japan
[2] Kyoto Univ, Dept Geophys, Sakyo Ku, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
[3] Jianzu Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Shenyang 110168, Peoples R China
关键词
regularization; multiple parameter regularization; satellite geodesy; geopotential; gravity recovery; orbit perturbation;
D O I
10.1007/s00190-006-0025-0
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Kaula's rule of thumb has been used in producing geopotential models from space geodetic measurements, including the most recent models from satellite gravity missions CHAMP. Although Xu and Rummel (Manuscr Geod 20 8-20, 1994b) suggested an alternative regularization method by introducing a number of regularization parameters, no numerical tests have ever been conducted. We have compared four methods of regularization for the determination of geopotential from precise orbits of COSMIC satellites through simulations, which include Kaula's rule of thumb, one parameter regularization and its iterative version, and multiple parameter regularization. The simulation results show that the four methods can indeed produce good gravitational models from the precise orbits of centimetre level. The three regularization methods perform much better than Kaula's rule of thumb by a factor of 6.4 on average beyond spherical harmonic degree 5 and by a factor of 10.2 for the spherical harmonic degrees from 8 to 14 in terms of degree variations of root mean squared errors. The maximum componentwise improvement in the root mean squared error can be up to a factor of 60. The simplest version of regularization by multiplying a positive scalar with a unit matrix is sufficient to better determine the geopotential model. Although multiple parameter regularization is theoretically attractive and can indeed eliminate unnecessary regularization for some of the harmonic coefficients, we found that it only improved its one parameter version marginally in this COSMIC example in terms of the mean squared error.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 27
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SPACE SCI REV
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured], DOI DOI 10.1080/00401706.1970.10488634
[3]   NONPARAMETRIC BAYESIAN REGRESSION [J].
BARRY, D .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1986, 14 (03) :934-953
[4]  
Bouman J., 1998, 982 DEOS
[5]  
BOUMAN J, 2000, THESIS DELFT U TECHN
[6]   COSMIC: Geodetic applications in improving earth's gravity model [J].
Chao, BF ;
Pavlis, EC ;
Hwang, CW ;
Liu, CC ;
Shum, CK ;
Tseng, CL ;
Yang, M .
TERRESTRIAL ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCES, 2000, 11 (01) :365-378
[7]   Computation of spherical harmonic coefficients from gravity gradiometry data to be acquired by the GOCE satellite: regularization issues [J].
Ditmar, P ;
Kusche, J ;
Klees, R .
JOURNAL OF GEODESY, 2003, 77 (7-8) :465-477
[8]   DETERMINATION OF THE GEOPOTENTIAL FROM SATELLITE-TO-SATELLITE TRACKING DATA [J].
DOUGLAS, BC ;
GOAD, CC ;
MORRISON, FF .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1980, 85 (NB10) :5471-5480
[9]  
Fletcher R., 2000, PRACTICAL METHODS OP
[10]  
Garcia RV, 2002, IAG SYMP, V125, P156