A prospective 8-year follow-up of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth of children and adolescents in Public Dental Health Service: reasons for replacement

被引:44
作者
Pallesen, Ulla [1 ]
van Dijken, Jan W. V. [2 ]
Halken, Jette [3 ]
Hallonsten, Anna-Lena [3 ]
Hoigaard, Ruth [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Odontol, Sect Cariol & Endodont & Paediat Dent & Clin Gene, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark
[2] Umea Univ, Dept Odontol, Umea, Sweden
[3] Publ Dent Hlth Serv, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Children; Clinical; Longevity; Posterior; Resin composite; Restorations; 4-YEAR CLINICAL-EVALUATION; FAILED RESTORATIONS; NANO-HYBRID; TOTAL-ETCH; SELF-ETCH; LONGEVITY; AMALGAM; FAILURE; PERFORMANCE; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-013-1052-x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to investigate reasons for replacement and repair of posterior resin composite (RC) restorations placed in permanent teeth of children and adolescents attending Public Dental Health Service in Denmark. All posterior RC placed consecutively by 115 dentists over a period of 4 years were evaluated at baseline and up to 8 years later. The endpoint of each restoration was defined when repair or replacement was performed. The influence of patient, dentist and material factors on reasons for repair or replacement was investigated. A total of 4,355 restorations were placed. Replacements comprised 406 and repairs 125 restorations. The cumulative survival rate at 8 years was 84 %. Failed restorations were most frequently seen due to secondary caries (57 %), post-operative sensitivity (POS) (10 %) and RC fracture (6 %). POS was observed in 1.5 % of the evaluations and reported more often in girls and from teeth restored with a base material. Older dentists showed lower proportion of replaced restorations due to secondary caries than younger dentists. Posterior RC restorations in children and adolescents performed in general practice showed a good durability with annual failure rates of 2 %. The main reason for failure was secondary caries followed by post-operative sensitivity and resin composite fracture. A high proportion of replaced/repaired RC restorations were caused by primary caries in a non-filled surface. Secondary caries was the main reason for failure of RC in children and young adults. More teeth with post-operative sensitivity and a shorter longevity of restorations were observed when a base material was used.
引用
收藏
页码:819 / 827
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
ADA Council on Scientific Affairs, 1998, J Am Dent Assoc, V129, P1627, DOI [10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0114, DOI 10.14219/JADA.ARCHIVE.1998.0114]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, OPER DENT, V30, P409
[3]  
Barnes D M, 1991, Quintessence Int, V22, P143
[4]   Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial [J].
Bernardo, Mario ;
Luis, Henrique ;
Martin, Michael D. ;
Leroux, Brian G. ;
Rue, Tessa ;
Leitao, Jorge ;
DeRouen, Timothy A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 138 (06) :775-783
[5]   A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year results [J].
Bottenberg, P. ;
Jacquet, W. ;
Alaerts, M. ;
Keulemans, F. .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2009, 37 (03) :198-203
[6]   Amalgam to tooth-coloured materials - implications for clinical practice and dental education: governmental restrictions and amalgam-usage survey results [J].
Burke, FJT .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 (05) :343-350
[7]  
Burke FJT, 1999, QUINTESSENCE INT, V30, P234
[8]   Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement [J].
Burke, FJT ;
Wilson, NHF ;
Cheung, SW ;
Mjör, IA .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2001, 29 (05) :317-324
[9]   Restorative treatment provided over five years for adults regularly attending general dental practice [J].
Clarkson, JE ;
Worthington, HV ;
Davies, RM .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2000, 28 (04) :233-239
[10]   How long do routine dental restorations last? A systematic review [J].
Downer, MC ;
Azli, NA ;
Bedi, R ;
Moles, DR ;
Setchell, DJ .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1999, 187 (08) :432-439