Dosimetric effects of prone and supine positions on post-implant assessments for prostate brachytherapy

被引:3
作者
Ohashi, Toshio [1 ,2 ]
Momma, Tetsuo [3 ]
Yamashita, Shoji [2 ]
Kanai, Kunimitsu [3 ]
Watanabe, Yusuke [2 ]
Hanada, Takashi [1 ]
Shigematsu, Naoyuki [1 ]
机构
[1] Keio Univ, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
[2] Natl Hosp Org Saitama Hosp, Dept Radiol, Saitama, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Saitama Hosp, Dept Urol, Saitama, Japan
关键词
prostate cancer; brachytherapy; post-implant; position; prone; 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; INTRAFRACTION MOTION; RADIATION-THERAPY; CANCER; RECOMMENDATIONS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.5114/jcb.2013.37695
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Post-implant dosimetric assessment is essential for optimal care of patients receiving prostate brachytherapy. In most institutions, post-implant computed tomography (CT) is performed in the supine position. This study aimed to assess variability in dosimetric parameters with postural changes during acquisition of post-implant CT scans. Material and methods: In total, 85 consecutive patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-three patients underwent seed implantation alone, and the remaining 32 received a combination of seed implantation and external beam radiotherapy. For post-implant analyses, CT scans were obtained in two patient positions, supine and prone. To evaluate differences in dosimetric parameters associated with postural change, the dosimetric data obtained in the supine position were defined as the standard. Results: The median prostate volume was 22.4 ml in the supine and 22.5 ml in the prone position (p = 0.51). The median prostate D-90 was 120.1% in the supine and 120.3% in the prone position, not significantly different. The mean prostate V-100 was 97.1% in the supine and 97.0% in the prone position, again not significantly different. Median rectal V-100 in supine and prone positions were 0.42 ml and 0.33 ml, respectively (p < 0.01). Rectal D-2cc was also significantly decreased in the prone as compared with the supine position (median, 59.1% vs. 63.6%; p < 0.01). A larger post-implant prostate volume was associated with decreased rectal doses in the prone position. Conclusions: Though there were no significant differences among prostate D-90 assessments according to postural changes, our results suggest that post-implant rectal doses decreased in the prone position.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 126
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Evaluation of rectal bleeding factors associated with prostate brachytherapy [J].
Aoki, Manabu ;
Miki, Kenta ;
Sasaki, Hiroshi ;
Kido, Masato ;
Shirahama, Jun ;
Takagi, Sayako ;
Kobayashi, Masao ;
Honda, Chikara ;
Kanehira, Chihiro .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 27 (10) :444-449
[2]   A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Bayley, AJ ;
Catton, CN ;
Haycocks, T ;
Kelly, V ;
Alasti, H ;
Bristow, R ;
Catton, P ;
Crook, J ;
Gospodarowicz, MK ;
McLean, M ;
Milosevic, M ;
Warde, P .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 70 (01) :37-44
[3]   Intrafraction motion of the prostate during an IMRT session: a fiducial-based 3D measurement with Cone-beam CT [J].
Boda-Heggemann, Judit ;
Koehler, Frederick Marc ;
Wertz, Hansjoerg ;
Ehmann, Michael ;
Hermann, Brigitte ;
Riesenacker, Nadja ;
Kuepper, Beate ;
Lohr, Frank ;
Wenz, Frederik .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2008, 3 (1)
[4]   Late rectal toxicity after prostate brachytherapy: Influence of supplemental external beam radiation on dose-volume histogram analysis [J].
Kalakota, Kapila ;
Rakhno, Eugenia ;
Pelizzari, Charles A. ;
Jani, Ashesh B. ;
Liauw, Stanley L. .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2010, 9 (02) :131-136
[5]   A comparison of prone three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with supine intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: which technique is more effective for rectal sparing? [J].
Kato, T. ;
Obata, Y. ;
Kadoya, N. ;
Fuwa, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2009, 82 (980) :654-661
[6]   Intrafraction motion of the prostate during external-beam radiation therapy: Analysis of 427 patients with implanted fiducial markers [J].
Kotte, Alexis N. T. J. ;
Hofman, Pieter ;
Lagendijk, Jan J. W. ;
van Vulpen, Marco ;
van der Heide, Uulke A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (02) :419-425
[7]   Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy [J].
Liu, Bei ;
Lerma, Fritz A. ;
Patel, Shilpen ;
Amin, Pradip ;
Feng, Yuanming ;
Yi, Byong Yong ;
Yu, Cedric .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 (01) :67-76
[8]   Intrafractional stability of the prostate using a stereotactic radiotherapy technique [J].
Madsen, BL ;
Hsi, RA ;
Pham, HT ;
Presser, J ;
Esagui, L ;
Corman, J ;
Myers, L ;
Jones, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 57 (05) :1285-1291
[9]   Report on the Early Efficacy and Tolerability of I125 Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy from a UK Multi-institutional Database [J].
Mitchell, D. M. ;
Mandall, P. ;
Bottomley, D. ;
Hoskin, P. J. ;
Logue, J. P. ;
Ash, D. ;
Ostler, P. ;
Elliott, T. ;
Henry, A. ;
Wylie, J. P. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 20 (10) :738-744
[10]   The American Brachytherapy Society recommendations for permanent prostate brachytherapy postimplant dosimetric analysis [J].
Nag, S ;
Bice, W ;
DeWyngaery, K ;
Prestidge, B ;
Stock, R ;
Yu, Y .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (01) :221-230