Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy

被引:113
作者
van den Bergh, JCJM
Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A
Munda, G
机构
[1] Free Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Fdn Econ Res, SEO, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Dept Econ & Econ Hist, Barcelona 08193, Spain
关键词
maximizing behaviour; methodology; social context; bounded rationality; satisficing; lexicographic preferences; habitual behaviour; endogenous preferences; risk and uncertainty;
D O I
10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00088-9
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Most insights of environmental economics are in line with the standard neoclassical economic model of rational behaviour, formulated in terms of maximization of utility in general, or of profits in particular. The standard theory of environmental policy is a case in point. However, the maximization hypothesis and its methodological foundation have been criticized on many grounds related to a lack of either logical or empirical content. Moreover, over the years a great many alternative models of behaviour have been proposed. Both criticism and alternatives are surveyed here. Attention is devoted to relevant insights fi om the philosophy of science, the notion of methodological individualism, and other criticism. The alternative behavioural models include bounded rationality and 'satisficing', lexicographic preferences, habitual behaviour, incommensurability and multicriteria evaluation, and various models of behaviour under uncertainty. Major implications of the criticism and alternative models of individual behaviour for environmental policy theory are outlined. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 61
页数:19
相关论文
共 100 条
[21]  
COSTANZA R, 1991, ECOLOGY EC SCI MANAG
[22]  
Daly HermanE., 1994, For the Common Good: Redirecting the Economy toward Community, the Environment, and a Sustainable Future, V2nd
[23]  
Deaton A., 1980, Economics and Consumer Behavior
[24]  
Edwards S.F., 1986, Northeastern Journal of Agriculture, V15, P145
[25]  
ERL P, 1986, LIFESTYLE EC CONSUME
[26]  
Feyerabend P., 1975, METHOD
[27]  
Foss N., 1993, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, V3, P127, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01213830, 10.1007/BF01213830]
[28]  
FREEMAN AM, 1993, MEASURMEENT ENV RES
[29]  
Friedman M., 1953, Essay in positive economics
[30]  
FROGER G, 1998, VALUATION SUSTAINABL