Seeking help from the low status group: Effects of status stability, type of help and social categorization

被引:14
作者
Halabi, Samer [1 ]
Dovidio, John F. [2 ]
Nadler, Arie [3 ]
机构
[1] Acad Coll Tel Aviv Yaffo, IL-61083 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Yale Univ, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
基金
以色列科学基金会;
关键词
Helping; Group status; Status stability; Social categorization; Social identity theory; Kind of help; IN-GROUP BIAS; INTERGROUP CONTACT; IDENTIFICATION; DOMINANCE; IDENTITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.010
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This research extended previous work on the relationship between intergroup status and helping exchanges by investigating the conditions that moderate the willingness of members of a high status group (psychology students) to seek help from a low status group (social work students). In Study 1, when participants believed that there was a threat to the stability of status relations, participants from the high status group were more willing to seek autonomy-oriented assistance, which is empowering, than dependency-oriented help, which could undermine their group's advantaged status. Study 2 considered how reframing the nature of intergroup relations by emphasizing common superordinate group membership can influence help-seeking among members of high status groups. When separate group identities were emphasized, the results replicated. However, as predicted, when common identity as mental health professional was made salient, psychology students were as willing to seek autonomy- and dependency-oriented help across both the unstable- and stable-relations conditions. Theoretical and applied implications are discussed. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 144
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, PSYCHOL PROSOCIAL BE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, REDUCING INTERGROUP
  • [3] To Be Liked Versus Respected: Divergent Goals in Interracial Interactions
    Bergsieker, Hilary B.
    Shelton, J. Nicole
    Richeson, Jennifer A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 99 (02) : 248 - 264
  • [4] Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability
    Bettencourt, BA
    Dorr, N
    Charlton, K
    Hume, DL
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2001, 127 (04) : 520 - 542
  • [5] Boen F., 2000, Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, V3, P41
  • [6] DAFNI N, 2002, MEGAMOT, V41, P607
  • [7] Dovidio J.F., 2006, The social psychology of prosocial behavior
  • [8] Dovidio JF., 2009, ATTITUDES INSIGHTS N, P165
  • [9] Dovidio JF, 2007, EUR REV SOC PSYCHOL, V18, P296, DOI 10.1080/10463280701726132
  • [10] Commonality and the Complexity of "We": Social Attitudes and Social Change
    Dovidio, John F.
    Gaertner, Samuel L.
    Saguy, Tamar
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2009, 13 (01) : 3 - 20