Experiences with a single-step genome evaluation

被引:68
作者
Misztal, Ignacy [1 ]
Aggrey, Samuel E. [2 ]
Muir, William M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Poultry Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Anim Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
single-step genomic relationship matrix; single nucleotide polymorphism; best linear unbiased prediction; genome-wide association study; FULL PEDIGREE; RELATIONSHIP MATRICES; GENETIC EVALUATION; PREDICTIONS; INFORMATION; SELECTION; ACCURACY; ANIMALS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3382/ps.2012-02739
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Genomic selection can be implemented based on the genomic relationship matrix (GBLUP) and can be combined with phenotypes from nongenotyped animals through the use of best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). A common method to combine both sources of information involves multiple steps, but is difficult to use with complicated models and is non-optimal. A simpler method, termed single-step GBLUP, or ssGBLUP, integrates the genomically derived relationships (G) with population-based pedigree relationships (A) into a combined relationship matrix (H) and allows for genomic selection in a single step. The ssGBLUP method is easy to implement and uses standard BLUP-based programs. Experiences with field data in chickens, pigs, and dairy indicate that ssGBLUP is more accurate yet much simpler than multi-step methods. The current limits of ssGBLUP are approximately 100,000 genotypes and 18 traits. Models involving 10 million animals have been run successfully. The inverse of H can also be used in existing programs for parameter estimationm, but a properly scaled G is needed for unbiased estimation. Also, as genomic predictions can be converted to SNP effects, ssGBLUP is useful for genomic-wide association studies. The single-step method for genomic selection translates the use of genomic information into standard BLUP, and variance-component estimation programs become a routine.
引用
收藏
页码:2530 / 2534
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Multiple trait genomic evaluation of conception rate in Holsteins [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Wiggans, G. R. ;
Lawlor, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (05) :2621-2624
[2]   Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Tsuruta, S. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2011, 128 (06) :422-428
[3]   Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Johnson, D. L. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Lawlor, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) :743-752
[4]   Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale [J].
Chen, C. Y. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Aguilar, I. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Muir, W. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (09) :2673-2679
[5]   Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens [J].
Chen, C. Y. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Aguilar, I. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Meuwissen, T. H. E. ;
Aggrey, S. E. ;
Wing, T. ;
Muir, W. M. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (01) :23-28
[6]   Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs [J].
Christensen, O. F. ;
Madsen, P. ;
Nielsen, B. ;
Ostersen, T. ;
Su, G. .
ANIMAL, 2012, 6 (10) :1565-1571
[7]   Genomic prediction when some animals are not genotyped [J].
Christensen, Ole F. ;
Lund, Mogens S. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2010, 42
[8]   The Impact of Genetic Architecture on Genome-Wide Evaluation Methods [J].
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Pong-Wong, Ricardo ;
Villanueva, Beatriz ;
Woolliams, John A. .
GENETICS, 2010, 185 (03) :1021-1031
[9]   Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information [J].
Forni, Selma ;
Aguilar, Ignacio ;
Misztal, Ignacy .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2011, 43
[10]  
Goddard ME, 2010, P 9 WORLD C GEN APPL, V701