Surgical resection versus radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinomas within the Milan criteria

被引:130
作者
Ueno, Shinichi [1 ]
Sakoda, Masahiko [1 ]
Kubo, Fumitake [1 ]
Hiwatashi, Kiyokazu [1 ]
Tateno, Taro [1 ]
Baba, Yoshiro [2 ]
Hasegawa, Susumu [3 ]
Tsubouchi, Hirohito [3 ]
机构
[1] Kagoshima Univ, Dept Surg Oncol & Digest Surg, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Kagoshima 8908520, Japan
[2] JA Kagoshima Kouseiren Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Kagoshima, Japan
[3] Kagoshima Univ, Dept Digest & Life Style Related Dis, Grad Sch Med & Dent Sci, Kagoshima 8908520, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY | 2009年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
Hepatocellular carcinoma; Milan criteria; Radiofrequency ablation therapy; Hepatic resection; Liver damage; NONCANCEROUS LIVER; ETHANOL INJECTION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; SINGLE SESSION; RISK-FACTORS; THERAPY; TUMORS; COMPLICATIONS; HEPATECTOMY; COAGULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00534-009-0069-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
It has been reported that hepatic resection may be preferable to other modalities for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), by contributing to improved overall and disease-free survival. Ablation techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) have also been used as therapy for small HCCs; however, few studies have compared the two treatments based on long-term outcomes. The effectiveness of hepatic resection and RFA for small nodular HCCs within the Milan criteria were compared. A retrospective cohort study was performed with 278 consecutive patients who underwent curative hepatic resection (n = 123) or initial RFA percutaneously (n = 110) or surgically (thoracoscopic-, laparoscopic-, and open-approaches; n = 45) for HCC. The selection criteria for treatment were based on uniform criteria. Mortality related to therapy and 3- and 5-year overall and disease-free survivals were analyzed. The model for endstage liver disease (MELD) scores for all patients in the series were less than 13. There were no therapy-related mortalities in either the hepatic resection or RFA groups. The incidence of death within 1 year after therapy (1.6 and 1.9%, respectively) was similar in the hepatic resection and RFA groups. The group that underwent hepatic resection showed a trend towards better survival (P = 0.06) and showed significantly better disease-free survival (P = 0.02) compared with the RFA group, although differences in liver functional reserve existed. The advantage of hepatic resection was more evident for patients with single tumors and patients with grade A liver damage. In contrast, patients with multinodular tumors survived longer when treated with RFA, regardless of the grade of liver damage. Further analysis showed that surgical RFA could potentially have survival benefits similar to those of hepatic resection for single tumors, and that surgical RFA had the highest efficacy for treating multinodular tumors. In patients with small HCCs within the Milan criteria, hepatic resection should still be employed for those patients with a single tumor and well-preserved liver function. RFA should be chosen for patients with an unresectable single tumor or those with multinodular tumors, regardless of the grade of liver damage. In order to increase long-term oncological control, surgical RFA seems preferable to percutaneous RFA, if the patient's condition allows them to tolerate surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 366
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] MELD score and hepatocellular carcinoma identify patients at different risk of short-term mortality among cirrhotics bleeding from esophageal varices
    Amitrano, L
    Guardascione, MA
    Bennato, R
    Manguso, F
    Balzano, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (06) : 820 - 825
  • [2] Aramaki M, 2004, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V51, P1784
  • [3] Hepatocellular carcinoma: Diagnosis and treatment
    Befeler, AS
    Di Bisceglie, AM
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 122 (06) : 1609 - 1619
  • [4] A prospective randomized trial comparing percutaneous local ablative therapy and partial hepatectomy for small hepatocellular carcinoma
    Chen, MS
    Li, JQ
    Zheng, Y
    Guo, RP
    Liang, HH
    Zhang, YQ
    Lin, XJ
    Lau, WY
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2006, 243 (03) : 321 - 328
  • [5] Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular cancer in 110 patients with cirrhosis
    Curley, SA
    Izzo, F
    Ellis, LM
    Vauthey, JN
    Vallone, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2000, 232 (03) : 381 - 389
  • [6] Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma -: The surgeon's role in long-term survival
    Fan, ST
    Ng, IOL
    Poon, RTP
    Lo, CM
    Liu, CL
    Wong, J
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1999, 134 (10) : 1124 - 1130
  • [7] Francica G, 1999, Eur J Ultrasound, V9, P145, DOI 10.1016/S0929-8266(99)00022-1
  • [8] Prognostic impact of anatomic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Hasegawa, K
    Kokudo, N
    Imamura, H
    Matsuyama, Y
    Aoki, T
    Minagawa, M
    Sano, K
    Sugawara, Y
    Takayama, T
    Makuuchi, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2005, 242 (02) : 252 - 259
  • [9] Comparing the outcomes of radiofrequency ablation and surgery in patients with a single small hepatocellular carcinoma and well-preserved hepatic function
    Hong, SN
    Lee, SY
    Choi, MS
    Lee, JH
    Koh, KC
    Paik, SW
    Yoo, BC
    Rhee, JC
    Choi, D
    Lim, HK
    Lee, KW
    Joh, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 39 (03) : 247 - 252
  • [10] Risk factors for the local recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after a single session of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
    Hori, T
    Nagata, K
    Hasuike, S
    Onaga, M
    Motoda, M
    Moriuchi, A
    Iwakiri, H
    Uto, H
    Kato, J
    Ido, A
    Hayashi, K
    Tsubouchi, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 38 (10) : 977 - 981