Bone biochemical markers and bone mineral density among osteoporosis patients who were seen in a pain clinic

被引:3
|
作者
Horiguchi, I
Ohtake, T
Saito, S
机构
[1] Isesaki City Hosp, Dept Anesthesia & Pain Clin, Isesaki 3720812, Japan
[2] Gunma Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimatol, Maebashi, Gumma 3718511, Japan
关键词
biochemical marker; menopause; osteoporosis; pain clinic;
D O I
10.1163/156856902760189197
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Osteoporosis is a common and debilitating disease affecting all bones. Examination of the serum concentration of bone biochemical markers is useful to distinguish the type of osteoporosis and to determine the optimal therapy for each patient. In the present study, four serum markers of bone formation (bone Gla protein; BGP, intact bone Gla protein; iBGP, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase; BAP, carboxy-terminal peptide of type I procollagen; PICP) and a plasma marker of bone resorption (tartrate resistant acid phosphatase; TRAP) were measured in 165 female patients who visited our pain clinic complaining of back and/or leg pain, and who were suspected of having osteoporosis (Japanese osteoporosis criteria 11 or 111) on standard skeletal radiograph. No significant correlation was observed between bone biochemical markers and mineral density, or between biochemical markers and age. The amount of BGP and iBGP determined in patients older than 70 was significantly higher than in patients younger than 70 (p < 0.05). The results show that bone turnover evaluated by biochemical markers is not necessarily age dependent. Therapy for osteoporosis in elderly women should be tailored for each case on the basis of the values of biochemical markers.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 68
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Correlation between biochemical bone markers among patients with osteoporosis who visited a pain clinic
    Horiguchi, I
    Ohtake, T
    Saito, S
    Goto, F
    PAIN CLINIC, 2003, 15 (01) : 17 - 24
  • [2] A comparison of the measurements with biochemical markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density in the assessment of the efficiency of osteoporosis treatment
    Ataoglu, M. Baybars
    Atik, O. Sahap
    Gul, Orkun
    Sarikaya, Baran
    Gormeli, Gokay
    Ozturk, Burak Yagmur
    Ozgurol, Baris
    EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2013, 24 (02): : 82 - 86
  • [3] Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone in patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria
    Hekimsoy, Z
    Biberoglu, S
    Kazimoglu, H
    Kirkali, Z
    Kirkali, G
    Tokgöz, Z
    ENDOCRINOLOGIST, 2003, 13 (05) : 417 - 421
  • [4] Methods to measure the bone density and the bone biochemical markers in the prevention of osteoporosis
    Dreux, C
    Delmas, PD
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2001, 185 (08): : 1561 - 1580
  • [5] Benefits and limitations of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers to monitor patients treated for osteoporosis
    Lewiecki E.M.
    Current Osteoporosis Reports, 2010, 8 (1) : 15 - 22
  • [6] Biochemical markers of bone turnover in osteoporosis
    Delmas, PD
    Beaudreuil, J
    REVUE DU RHUMATISME, 1997, 64 (06): : S31 - S36
  • [7] Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone metabolism in ankylosing spondylitis
    Bronson, WD
    Walker, SE
    Hillman, LS
    Keisler, D
    Hoyt, T
    Allen, SH
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1998, 25 (05) : 929 - 935
  • [8] Predictors of bone mineral density and osteoporosis in patients attending a rheumatology outpatient clinic
    Lee, YH
    Rho, YH
    Choi, SJ
    Ji, JD
    Song, GG
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 23 (02) : 67 - 69
  • [9] Bone mineral density and biochemical markers in evaluation of bone health in women
    Gupta, Uma
    Sharma, Shruti
    Gupta, Narendra Kumar
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 39 (04): : 376 - 380
  • [10] Monitoring osteoporosis therapy: Bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, or both?
    Bonnick, SL
    Shulman, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 119 (04) : 25S - 31S