Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children

被引:136
|
作者
Wong, Sik-Nin
Sung, Rita Yn Tz
Leung, Lettie Chuk-Kwan
机构
[1] Tuen Mun Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Prince Wales Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Kwong Wah Hosp, Dept Paediat & Adolescent Med, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
blood pressure; children; datascope; Dinamap; European Society of Hypertension; international protocol; oscillometric; validation study; Welch-Allyn;
D O I
10.1097/01.mbp.0000209082.09623.b4
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Aim To validate Welch-Allyn Vital Sign Monitor, Dinamap Procare-120 and Datascope Accutorr Plus against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children aged 5-15 years old according to the International Protocol of European Society of Hypertension adapted for validation in children. Method One hundred and thirty two children were studied (44 for each device; 67 boys, 65 girls). Each underwent seven sequential BP measurements on the right arm resting in the sifting position, alternately with the mercury sphygmomanometer read simultaneously by two independent trained observers and the test device by a third observer. Results For the Welch-Allyn monitor, the mean +/- SD of differences (device minus auscultatory BP) were -4.39 +/- 4.82 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -4.1 +/- 707 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device failed phase 2.1 for both systolic blood pressure (55, 91 and 98% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively) and diastolic blood pressure measurements (46, 82 and 95% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively). For the Dinamap device, the mean +/- SD of differences were -3.08 +/- 5.21 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -4.61 +/- 9.35 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device passed phase 2.1 for systolic blood pressure (71, 96 and 98% were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively) but failed for diastolic blood pressure (51, 72 and 91% were within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg, respectively). For the Datascope device, mean +/- SD of differences were -0.9 +/- 4.33 mmHg for systolic blood pressure and -1.20 +/- 6.48 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure. The device passed phase 2.1 in that 84, 97 and 99% of systolic blood pressure, and 61, 89 and 97% of diastolic blood pressure readings were within 5, 10 and 15 mmHg, respectively. It also passed phase 2.2 for both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion We performed an independent validation of three oscillometric BP devices in children. Overall Datascope Accutorr Plus passed, whereas Welch-Allyn Vital Sign Monitor and Dinamap Procare-120 failed an adapted IP-ESH. Blood Press Monit 11:281-291 (C) 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 291
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative study on auscultatory and oscillometric methods of ambulatory blood pressure measurements in adult patients
    Genc, Yasemin
    Altunkan, Sekip
    Kilinc, Oguzhan
    Altunkan, Erkan
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2008, 13 (01) : 29 - 35
  • [22] The impact of body mass index on blood pressure measured with mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus
    Aguirre-Salas, Liuba M.
    Jesus Perez-Molina, J.
    Fonseca-Reyes, Salvador
    Becerra-Villa, Jorge A.
    Silva-Camarena, Mayra del C.
    BOLETIN MEDICO DEL HOSPITAL INFANTIL DE MEXICO, 2019, 76 (03): : 126 - 133
  • [23] Comparison of validation protocols for blood pressure measuring devices in children and adolescents
    Stabouli, Stella
    Chainoglou, Athanasia
    Evripidou, Kleo
    Simao, Carla
    Antza, Christina
    Petrou, Panagiotis
    Hamdani, Gilad
    Calpe, Javier
    Lurbe, Empar
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [24] BLOOD-PRESSURE MONITORING - AUTOMATED OSCILLOMETRIC DEVICES
    RAMSEY, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING, 1991, 7 (01): : 56 - 67
  • [25] Inflationary oscillometric blood pressure monitoring: validation of the OMRON-MIT
    Golara, M
    Jones, C
    Randhawa, M
    Shennan, AH
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2002, 7 (06) : 325 - 328
  • [26] Validation of the Welch Allyn 'Vital Signs' oscillometric blood pressure monitor
    Jones, CR
    Taylor, K
    Poston, L
    Shennan, AH
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2001, 15 (03) : 191 - 195
  • [27] Validation of the Welch Allyn ‘Vital Signs’ oscillometric blood pressure monitor
    CR Jones
    K Taylor
    L Poston
    AH Shennan
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 2001, 15 : 191 - 195
  • [28] Artificial Intelligence Based Blood Pressure Estimation From Auscultatory and Oscillometric Waveforms: A Methodological Review
    Argha, Ahmadreza
    Celler, Branko G.
    Lovell, Nigel H.
    IEEE REVIEWS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 15 : 152 - 168
  • [29] Wearable Wireless-Enabled Oscillometric Sphygmomanometer: A Flexible Ambulatory Tool for Blood Pressure Estimation
    Juteau, Nicolas
    Gosselin, Benoit
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 14 (06) : 1287 - 1298
  • [30] Demise of the mercury sphygmomanometer and the dawning of a new era in blood pressure measurement
    O'Brien, E
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2003, 8 (01) : 19 - 21