Initiating and Utilizing Shared Leadership in Teams: The Role of Leader Humility, Team Proactive Personality, and Team Performance Capability

被引:268
作者
Chiu, Chia-Yen [1 ]
Owens, Bradley P. [2 ]
Tesluk, Paul E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Ctr Workplace Excellence, EM4-26 UniSA City West, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
[2] Brigham Young Univ, Marriott Sch Management, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Org & Human Resources, Buffalo, NY USA
关键词
shared leadership; leader humility; team characteristics; team leadership; TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP; METHOD BIAS; MANAGEMENT; ANTECEDENTS; NETWORK; CONSEQUENCES; MULTILEVEL; CONTINGENCY; PERCEPTIONS; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1037/apl0000159
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present study was designed to produce novel theoretical insight regarding how leader humility and team member characteristics foster the conditions that promote shared leadership and when shared leadership relates to team effectiveness. Drawing on social information processing theory and adaptive leadership theory, we propose that leader humility facilitates shared leadership by promoting leadership-claiming and leadership-granting interactions among team members. We also apply dominance complementary theory to propose that team proactive personality strengthens the impact of leader humility on shared leadership. Finally, we predict that shared leadership will be most strongly related to team performance when team members have high levels of task-related competence. Using a sample composed of 62 Taiwanese professional work teams, we find support for our proposed hypothesized model. The theoretical and practical implications of these results for team leadership, humility, team composition, and shared leadership are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1705 / 1720
页数:16
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]  
Aiken L.S., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.2010.53503267
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, THESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1973, LEADERSHIP DECISION
[5]   Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis [J].
Bell, Suzanne T. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (03) :595-615
[6]   Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG(J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines [J].
Biemann, Torsten ;
Cole, Michael S. ;
Voelpel, Sven .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2012, 23 (01) :66-80
[7]  
Bliese P.D., 2000, MULTILEVEL THEORY RE, P3, DOI DOI 10.12691/EDUCATION-3-1-14
[8]   Ready to Rumble: How Team Personality Composition and Task Conflict Interact to Improve Performance [J].
Bradley, Bret H. ;
Klotz, Anthony C. ;
Postlethwaite, Bennett E. ;
Brown, Kenneth G. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 98 (02) :385-392
[9]  
Brislin R.W., 1980, HDB CROSS CULTURAL P, V2, P389, DOI DOI 10.3390/HEALTHCARE6030093
[10]   Power, Status, and Learning in Organizations [J].
Bunderson, J. Stuart ;
Reagans, Ray E. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2011, 22 (05) :1182-1194