Oil-CO2 MMP Determination in Competition of Neural Network, Support Vector Regression, and Committee Machine

被引:24
|
作者
Asoodeh, Mojtaba [1 ]
Gholami, Amin [2 ]
Bagheripour, Parisa [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Birjand Branch, Birjand, Iran
[2] Petr Univ Technol, Abadan, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Gachsaran Branch, Dept Petr Engn, Gachsaran, Iran
关键词
Committee machine; minimum miscible pressure; miscible CO2 injection; neural network; support vector regression; MINIMUM MISCIBILITY PRESSURE; WELL LOG DATA; PREDICTION; IMPURE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1080/01932691.2013.803255
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Oil-CO2 minimum miscible pressure (MMP) has significance in selecting appropriate reservoir for miscible gas injection and greatly governs performance of local displacement. Accurate determination of MMP is very expensive, time-consuming, and labor intensive. Therefore, the quest for a method to determine MMP accurately and save time and money is necessary. This study held a competition between neural network and support vector regression models and assessed their performance in prediction of MMP for both pure and impure miscible CO2 injection. Subsequently, a committee machine was constructed based on divide and conquer principle to reap benefits of both model and increases the precision of final prediction. Results indicated committee machine performed more satisfyingly compared with individual intelligent models performing alone.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 571
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oil-CO2 minimum miscible pressure (MMP) determination using a stimulated smart approach
    Zargar, Ghassem
    Bagheripour, Parisa
    Asoodeh, Mojtaba
    Gholami, Amin
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 93 (10) : 1730 - 1735
  • [2] Prediction of minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) of the crude oil-CO2 systems within a unified and consistent machine learning framework
    Huang, Can
    Tian, Leng
    Wu, Jianbang
    Li, Mingyi
    Li, Zhongcheng
    Li, Jinlong
    Wang, Jiaxin
    Jiang, Lili
    Yang, Daoyong
    FUEL, 2023, 337
  • [3] Integrating support vector regression with genetic algorithm for CO2-oil minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) in pure and impure CO2 streams
    Bian, Xiao-Qiang
    Han, Bing
    Du, Zhi-Min
    Jaubert, Jean-Noel
    Li, Ming-Jun
    FUEL, 2016, 182 : 550 - 557
  • [4] Estimation of Crude Oil Minimum Miscibility Pressure During CO2 Flooding: A Comparative Study of Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Back Propagation Neural Network
    Zhang, Jin
    Zhang, Xiuqing
    Dong, Shaoyang
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 IEEE 5TH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (ITOEC 2020), 2020, : 279 - 289
  • [5] Comparison Neural Network and Support Vector Machine for Production Quantity Prediction
    Dzakiyullah, Nur Rachman
    Hussin, Burairah
    Saleh, Chairul
    Handani, Aditian Maytri
    ADVANCED SCIENCE LETTERS, 2014, 20 (10-12) : 2129 - 2133
  • [6] Simulation of groundwater level variations using wavelet combined with neural network, linear regression and support vector machine
    Ebrahimi, Hadi
    Rajaee, Taher
    GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2017, 148 : 181 - 191
  • [7] Comparisons of Support Vector Regression and Neural Network in Modelling the Hydraulic Damper
    Guo, Konghui
    Wang, Xianyun
    MEMS, NANO AND SMART SYSTEMS, PTS 1-6, 2012, 403-408 : 3805 - 3812
  • [8] Estimation of dam reservoir volume fluctuations using artificial neural network and support vector regression
    Unes, F.
    Yildirim, S.
    Cigizoglu, H. K.
    Coskun, H.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2013, 1 (03): : 53 - 74
  • [9] Application of generalized regression neural network and support vector regression for monthly rainfall forecasting in western Jilin Province, China
    Lu, Wenxi
    Chu, Haibo
    Zhang, Zheng
    JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2015, 64 (01): : 95 - 104
  • [10] An application of a practical neural network model for solving support vector regression problems
    Feizi, Amir
    Nazemi, Alireza
    INTELLIGENT DATA ANALYSIS, 2017, 21 (06) : 1443 - 1461