Where is the neck? Alpha angle measurement revisited

被引:21
作者
Bouma, Heinse [1 ]
Slot, Niels-Jan [1 ]
Toogood, Paul [2 ]
Pollard, Tom [3 ]
van Kampen, Paulien [1 ]
Hogervorst, Tom [1 ]
机构
[1] Haga Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Orthopaed Surg, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Royal Berkshire Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Reading RG1 5AN, Berks, England
关键词
FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; HIP; OSTEOARTHRITIS;
D O I
10.3109/17453674.2014.899841
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and purpose - The alpha angle is the most used measurement to classify concavity of the femoral head-neck junction. It is not only used for treatment decisions for hip impingement, but also in cohort studies relating hip morphology and osteoarthritis. Alpha angle measurement requires identification of the femoral neck axis, the definition of which may vary between studies. The original "3-point method" uses 1 single point to construct the femoral neck axis, whereas the "anatomic method" uses multiple points and attempts to define the true anatomic neck axis. Depending on the method used, the alpha angle may or may not account for other morphological characteristics such as headneck offset. Methods - We compared 2 methods of alpha angle measurement (termed "anatomic" and "3-point") in 59 cadaver femora and 83 cross-table lateral radiographs of asymptomatic subjects. Results were compared using Bland-Altman plots. Results - Discrepancies of up to 13 degrees were seen between the methods. The 3-point method had an "equalizing effect" by disregarding femoral head position relative to the neck: in femora with high alpha angle, it resulted in lower values than anatomic measurement, and vice versa in femora with low alpha angles. Using the anatomic method, we derived a reference interval for the alpha angle in normal hips in the general population of 30-66 degrees. Interpretation - We recommend the anatomic method because it also reflects the position of the femoral head on the neck. Consensus and standardization of technique of alpha angle measurement is warranted, not only for planar measurements but also for CT or MRI-based measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 151
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Cam impingement causes osteoarthritis of the hip: a nationwide prospective cohort study (CHECK) [J].
Agricola, Rintje ;
Heijboer, Marinus P. ;
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M. A. ;
Verhaar, Jan A. N. ;
Weinans, Harrie ;
Waarsing, Jan H. .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2013, 72 (06) :918-923
[2]   Femoroacetabular cam-type impingement: Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiographic views compared to radial MRI [J].
Domayer, S. E. ;
Ziebarth, K. ;
Chan, J. ;
Bixby, S. ;
Mamisch, T. C. ;
Kim, Y. J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (03) :805-810
[3]  
Eijer H., 2001, HIP INT, V11, P37, DOI [10.1177/112070000101100104, DOI 10.1177/112070000101100104]
[4]   The Cam Impinging Femur Has Multiple Morphologic Abnormalities [J].
Ellis, Andrew R. ;
Noble, Philip C. ;
Schroder, Steven J. ;
Thompson, Matthew T. ;
Stocks, Gregory W. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (06) :59-65
[5]   The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip - An integrated mechanical concept [J].
Ganz, Reinhold ;
Leunig, Michael ;
Leunig-Ganz, Katharina ;
Harris, William H. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (02) :264-272
[6]  
Hogervorst T, 2012, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V28, P3284
[7]   Evolution of the hip and pelvis [J].
Hogervorst, Tom ;
Bouma, Heinse W. ;
de Vos, John .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2009, 80 :1-39
[8]   Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement [J].
Johnston, Todd L. ;
Schenker, Mara L. ;
Briggs, Karen K. ;
Philippon, Marc J. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2008, 24 (06) :669-675
[9]   Comparison of six radiographic projections to assess femoral head/neck asphericity [J].
Meyer, Dominik C. ;
Beck, Martin ;
Ellis, Tom ;
Ganz, Reinhold ;
Leunig, Michael .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (445) :181-185
[10]  
MURRAY R O, 1971, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery British Volume, V53, P406