Hyperbaric prilocaine vs. hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in women undergoing elective caesarean section: a comparative randomised double-blind study

被引:13
作者
Chapron, K. [1 ]
Sleth, J. -C. [2 ]
Capdevila, X. [1 ]
Bringuier, S. [3 ]
Dadure, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, Lapeyronie Univ Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Montpellier, France
[2] St Roch Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Montpellier, CHU Montpellier, La Colombiere Univ Hosp, Clin Res & Epidemiol Unit, Montpellier, France
关键词
caesarean section; motor block; prilocaine; spinal anaesthesia; LOCAL-ANESTHETICS; DELIVERY; SURGERY; OPIOIDS; ED50; ED95;
D O I
10.1111/anae.15342
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anaesthesia remains the gold standard for elective caesarean section, but the resultant clinical effects can be unpredictable. Hyperbaric prilocaine induces shorter motor block but has not previously been studied in the obstetric spinal anaesthesia setting. We aimed to compare duration of motor block after spinal anaesthesia with prilocaine or bupivacaine during elective caesarean section. In this prospective randomised, double-blind study, women with uncomplicated pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included: patients aged 175 cm; a desire to breastfeed; or a contra-indication to spinal anaesthesia. Patients were randomly allocated to two groups: the prilocaine group underwent spinal anaesthesia with 60 mg intrathecal prilocaine; and the bupivacaine group received 12.5 mg intrathecal heavy bupivacaine. Both 2.5 mu g sufentanil and 100 mu g morphine were added to the local anaesthetic agent in both groups. The primary outcome was duration of motor block, which was assessed every 15 min after arriving in the post-anaesthetic care unit. Maternal haemodynamics, APGAR scores, pain scores, patient satisfaction and side-effects were recorded. Fifty patients were included, with 25 randomly allocated to each group. Median (IQR [range]) motor block duration was significantly shorter in the prilocaine group, 158 (125-188 [95-249]) vs. 220 (189-250 [89-302]) min, p < 0.001. Median length of stay in the post-anaesthetic care unit was significantly shorter in the prilocaine group, 135 (120-180 [120-230]) vs. 180 (150-195 [120-240]) min, p = 0.009. There was no difference between groups for: maternal intra-operative hypotension; APGAR score; umbilical cord blood pH; maternal postoperative pain; and patients' or obstetricians' satisfaction. We conclude that hyperbaric prilocaine induces a shorter and more reliable motor block than hyperbaric bupivacaine for women with uncomplicated pregnancy undergoing elective caesarean section.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 784
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   A Proposal for a New Method of Evaluation of the Newborn Infant [J].
Apgar, Virginia .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 120 (05) :1056-1059
[2]   Spinal anaesthesia for ambulatory arthroscopic surgery of the knee: a comparison of low-dose prilocaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and fentanyl [J].
Black, A. S. ;
Newcombe, G. N. ;
Plummer, J. L. ;
McLeod, D. H. ;
Martin, D. K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2011, 106 (02) :183-188
[3]   A history of neuraxial administration of local analgesics and opioids [J].
Brill, S ;
Gurman, GM ;
Fisher, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 20 (09) :682-689
[4]  
Bromage P R, 1965, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl, V16, P55
[5]   Inadequate spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% Marcain Heavy (Batch 2016) [J].
Calthorpe, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2004, 13 (02) :131-131
[6]   Factors Determining the Choice of Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery: Results of a Multicenter Observational Study [J].
Capdevila, Xavier ;
Aveline, Christophe ;
Delaunay, Laurent ;
Bouaziz, Herve ;
Zetlaoui, Paul ;
Choquet, Olivier ;
Jouffroy, Laurent ;
Herman-Demars, Helene ;
Bonnet, Francis .
ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2020, 37 (01) :527-540
[7]   Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2) [J].
Caughey, Aaron B. ;
Wood, Stephen L. ;
Macones, George A. ;
Wrench, Ian J. ;
Huang, Jeffrey ;
Norman, Mikael ;
Pettersson, Karin ;
Fawcett, William J. ;
Shalabi, Medhat M. ;
Metcalfe, Amy ;
Gramlich, Leah ;
Nelson, Gregg ;
Wilson, R. Douglas .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 219 (06) :533-544
[8]   Intracranial subdural haematoma following neuraxial anaesthesia in the obstetric population: a literature review with analysis of 56 reported cases [J].
Cuypers, V. ;
Van de Velde, M. ;
Devroe, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2016, 25 :58-65
[9]  
Dollery C, 1999, THERAPEUTIC DRUG, V2, P198
[10]   Safety of local anesthetics [J].
Figueiredo Pereira Cherobin, Ana Carolina ;
Tavares, Glaysson Tassara .
ANAIS BRASILEIROS DE DERMATOLOGIA, 2020, 95 (01) :82-90