Computable general equilibrium models for sustainability impact assessment:: Status quo and prospects

被引:96
作者
Boehringer, Christoph
Loeschel, Andreas
机构
[1] European Commiss, DG Joint Res Ctr, IPTS, E-41092 Seville, Spain
[2] Ctr European Econ Res ZEW, D-68034 Mannheim, Germany
[3] Heidelberg Univ, D-68034 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
computable general equilibrium models; sustainability impact assessment; sustainable development indicators;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.006
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Sustainability Impact Assessment (SIA) of economic, environmental, and social effects triggered by governmental policies has become a central requirement for policy design. The three dimensions of SIA are inherently intertwined and subject to trade-offs. Quantification of trade-offs for policy decision support requires numerical models in order to assess systematically the interference of complex interacting forces that affect economic performance, environmental quality, and social conditions. This paper investigates the use of computable general equilibrium (CGE) models for measuring the impacts of policy interference on policy-relevant economic, environmental, and social (institutional) indicators. We find that operational CGE models used for energy-economy-environment (E3) analyses have a good coverage of central economic indicators. Environmental indicators such as energy-related emissions with direct links to economic activities are widely covered, whereas indicators with complex natural science background such as water stress or biodiversity loss are hardly represented. Social indicators stand out for very weak coverage, mainly because they are vaguely defined or incommensurable. Our analysis identifies prospects for future modeling in the field of integrated assessment that link standard E3-CGE-models to themespecific complementary models with environmental and social focus. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 64
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1986, OECD Journal: Economic Studies
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, IMAGE 2 2 IMPL SRES
  • [3] [Anonymous], 992 PURD U DEP AGR E
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2001, J ENV ASSE POLIC MAN
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2001, IND SUST DEV GUID ME
  • [6] ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
  • [7] BABIKER MH, 2001, MIT EMISSIONS PREDIC, V71
  • [8] Bchir M-H, 2002, 200217 CEPII
  • [9] Berck P., 1991, The economics and management of water and drainage in agriculture., P489
  • [10] BERGMAN L, 1990, GEN EQUILIBRIUM MODE, P3