Root resorption of maxillary incisors retracted with and without skeletal anchorage
被引:14
作者:
Barros, Sergio Estelita
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2492, BR-90035003 Porto Alegre, RS, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2492, BR-90035003 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Barros, Sergio Estelita
[1
]
Janson, Guilherme
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2492, BR-90035003 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Janson, Guilherme
[2
]
Chiqueto, Kelly
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sao Leopoldo Mand Dent Res Ctr, Dept Orthodont, Sch Dent, Campinas, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2492, BR-90035003 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Chiqueto, Kelly
[3
]
Baldo, Vitor Oliveira
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2492, BR-90035003 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Baldo, Vitor Oliveira
[2
]
Baldo, Taiana Oliveira
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2492, BR-90035003 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Baldo, Taiana Oliveira
[2
]
机构:
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Dept Orthodont, Fac Dent, Rua Ramiro Barcelos 2492, BR-90035003 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Bauru, SP, Brazil
[3] Sao Leopoldo Mand Dent Res Ctr, Dept Orthodont, Sch Dent, Campinas, SP, Brazil
Introduction: Our objective was to compare root resorption degree of the maxillary central incisors retracted with and without skeletal anchorage. Methods: This nonrandomized historical control study included 37 patients requiring maximum anterior retraction and treated with extraction of 2 maxillary premolars. Group 1 consisted of 22 patients ( 11 male, 11 female) in whom anterior retraction was performed without skeletal anchorage, and group 2 included 15 patients ( 3 male, 12 female) treated with skeletally anchored anterior retraction. Periapical radiographs were used to evaluate root resorption degree by a scoring system. The groups were compared regarding the resorption score and resorption degree distribution with the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and Z test on proportions. Results: There was no statistically significant intergroup difference regarding root resorption, but the number of patients with severe and extreme root resorption degrees was significantly greater in group 2. Conclusions: Although the root resorption degree of the skeletal anchorage group was not significantly different from the group without skeletal anchorage, the number of patients with severe to extreme resorption in the first group was significantly greater. Therefore, careful clinical monitoring of skeletally anchored anterior retraction is needed, especially when there are known root resorption predisposing factors.