Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB with collapsed cone convolution/superposition and anisotropic analytic algorithm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of thoracic spinal metastases

被引:27
作者
Zhen, Heming [1 ]
Hrycushko, Brian [1 ]
Lee, Huichen [1 ]
Timmerman, Robert [1 ]
Pompos, Arnold [1 ]
Stojadinovic, Strahinja [1 ]
Foster, Ryan [1 ]
Jiang, Steve B. [1 ]
Solberg, Timothy [2 ]
Gu, Xuejun [1 ]
机构
[1] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Ctr Adv Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2015年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
Acuros; heterogeneity correction; stereotactic; SBRT; spine radiotherapy; DOSE CALCULATION ALGORITHMS; MONTE-CARLO; RADIATION-THERAPY; IMPACT; RADIOSURGERY; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5493
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study is to compare the recent Eclipse Acuros XB (AXB) dose calculation engine with the Pinnacle collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CCC) dose calculation algorithm and the Eclipse anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) treatment planning of thoracic spinal (T-spine) metastases using IMRT and VMAT delivery techniques. The three commissioned dose engines (CCC, AAA, and AXB) were validated with ion chamber and EBT2 film measurements utilizing a heterogeneous slab-geometry water phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom. Step-and-shoot IMRT and VMAT treatment plans were developed and optimized for eight patients in Pinnacle, following our institutional SAbR protocol for spinal metastases. The CCC algorithm, with heterogeneity corrections, was used for dose calculations. These plans were then exported to Eclipse and recalculated using the AAA and AXB dose calculation algorithms. Various dosimetric parameters calculated with CCC and AAA were compared to that of the AXB calculations. In regions receiving above 50% of prescription dose, the calculated CCC mean dose is 3.1%-4.1% higher than that of AXB calculations for IMRT plans and 2.8%-3.5% higher for VMAT plans, while the calculated AAA mean dose is 1.5%-2.4% lower for IMRT and 1.2%-1.6% lower for VMAT. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for most GTV and PTV indices between the CCC and AXB calculations for IMRT and VMAT, while differences between the AAA and AXB calculations were not statistically significant. For T-spine SAbR treatment planning, the CCC calculations give a statistically significant overestimation of target dose compared to AXB. AAA underestimates target dose with no statistical significance compared to AXB. Further study is needed to determine the clinical impact of these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 192
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2014, J APPL CLIN MED PHYS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, TECDOC1583 IAEA
  • [3] The impact of electron transport on the accuracy of computed dose
    Arnfield, MR
    Siantar, CH
    Siebers, J
    Garmon, P
    Cox, L
    Mohan, R
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (06) : 1266 - 1274
  • [4] Stereotactic body radiation therapy: The report of AAPM Task Group 101
    Benedict, Stanley H.
    Yenice, Kamil M.
    Followill, David
    Galvin, James M.
    Hinson, William
    Kavanagh, Brian
    Keall, Paul
    Lovelock, Michael
    Meeks, Sanford
    Papiez, Lech
    Purdie, Thomas
    Sadagopan, Ramaswamy
    Schell, Michael C.
    Salter, Bill
    Schlesinger, David J.
    Shiu, Almon S.
    Solberg, Timothy
    Song, Danny Y.
    Stieber, Volker
    Timmerman, Robert
    Tome, Wolfgang A.
    Verellen, Dirk
    Wang, Lu
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (08) : 4078 - 4101
  • [5] Intensity-modulated stereotactic radiotherapy of paraspinal tumors: A preliminary report
    Bilsky, MH
    Yamada, Y
    Yenice, KM
    Lovelock, M
    Hunt, M
    Gutin, PH
    Leibel, SA
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2004, 54 (04) : 823 - 830
  • [6] EFFECTS OF DOSIMETRIC AND CLINICAL UNCERTAINTY ON COMPLICATION-FREE LOCAL TUMOR-CONTROL
    BOYER, AL
    SCHULTHEISS, T
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 11 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [7] Dosimetric validation of Acuros® XB with Monte Carlo methods for photon dose calculations
    Bush, K.
    Gagne, I. M.
    Zavgorodni, S.
    Ansbacher, W.
    Beckham, W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (04) : 2208 - 2221
  • [8] Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities
    Carrasco, P.
    Jornet, N.
    Duch, M. A.
    Panettieri, V.
    Weber, L.
    Eudaldo, T.
    Ginjaume, M.
    Ribas, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (08) : 3323 - 3333
  • [9] Phase I/II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastasis and its pattern of failure
    Chang, Eric L.
    Shiu, Almon S.
    Mendel, Ehud
    Mathews, Leni A.
    Mahajan, Anita
    Allen, Pamela K.
    Weinberg, Jeffrey S.
    Brown, Barry W.
    Wang, Xin Shelly
    Woo, Shiao Y.
    Cleeland, Charles
    Maor, Moshe H.
    Rhines, Laurence D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (02) : 151 - 160
  • [10] Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: Report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM
    Das, Indra J.
    Cheng, Chee-Wai
    Watts, Ronald J.
    Ahnesjo, Anders
    Gibbons, John
    Li, X. Allen
    Lowenstein, Jessica
    Mitra, Raj K.
    Simon, William E.
    Zhu, Timothy C.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (09) : 4186 - 4215