Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies for Roadway Assets and Networks: A State-of-the-Art Review

被引:43
作者
El-Maissi, Ahmad Mohamad [1 ]
Argyroudis, Sotirios A. [2 ]
Nazri, Fadzli Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Civil Engn, Engn Campus, George Town 14300, Malaysia
[2] Brunel Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn Design & Phys Sci, London UB8 3PH, England
关键词
vulnerability assessment; road network fragility functions; vulnerability index; accessibility index; link importance index; resilient infrastructure; cities disaster risk reduction; 1999; CHI-CHI; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE; RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT; FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT; NATURAL DISASTERS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; ACCESSIBILITY; EARTHQUAKE; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.3390/su13010061
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Road networks are considered as one of the most important transport infrastructure systems, since they attain the economic and social prosperity of modern societies. For this reason, it is vital to improve the resiliency of road networks in order to function normally under daily stressors and recover quickly after natural disasters such as an earthquake event. In the last decades, vulnerability assessment studies for road networks and their assets gained great attention among the research community. This literature review includes a brief introduction about seismic vulnerability assessment, followed by the roadway assets damage and their damage states, and then the main typologies for the vulnerability assessment of roadway assets. Moreover, it focuses on available assessment methods, which were proposed to quantify the vulnerability of road networks and its assets. These methods are divided into two main categories, physical and traffic-based approaches. Methods based on fragility functions and vulnerability indexes were investigated in physical approach for roadways and its assets. On the other hand, accessibility and link importance index were explored in traffic-based approach for road networks. This paper reviews and comments the most common vulnerability assessment methods for road networks and its assets and points out their advantages and disadvantages. The main gaps and needs are identified and recommendations for future studies are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:31
相关论文
共 177 条
[21]   Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: State-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience [J].
Argyroudis, Sotirios A. ;
Mitoulis, Stergios A. ;
Winter, Mike G. ;
Kaynia, Amir M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2019, 191
[22]  
Argyroudis S, 2018, GEOTECH SP, P174
[23]   Analytical seismic fragility functions for highway and railway embankments and cuts [J].
Argyroudis, Sotiris ;
Kaynia, Amir M. .
EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2015, 44 (11) :1863-1879
[24]   An experience in using machine learning for short-term predictions in smart transportation systems [J].
Bacciu, Davide ;
Carta, Antonio ;
Gnesi, Stefania ;
Semini, Laura .
JOURNAL OF LOGICAL AND ALGEBRAIC METHODS IN PROGRAMMING, 2017, 87 :52-66
[25]   Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis [J].
Baker, Jack W. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2015, 31 (01) :579-599
[26]   Measuring vulnerability of road network considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas [J].
Balijepalli, Chandra ;
Oppong, Olivia .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 39 :145-155
[27]  
Basoz N.I., 1998, EVALUATION BRIDGE DA
[28]  
Bayraktarli Y.Y., 2005, P 9 INT C STRUCTURAL, P3505
[29]   THE ESTIMATION OF AN ORIGIN-DESTINATION MATRIX FROM TRAFFIC COUNTS [J].
BELL, MGH .
TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 1983, 17 (02) :198-217
[30]  
BENDER B. D., 1997, TRANSPORT RES REC, V1606, P51, DOI DOI 10.3141/1606-07