Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies for Roadway Assets and Networks: A State-of-the-Art Review

被引:43
作者
El-Maissi, Ahmad Mohamad [1 ]
Argyroudis, Sotirios A. [2 ]
Nazri, Fadzli Mohamed [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sains Malaysia, Sch Civil Engn, Engn Campus, George Town 14300, Malaysia
[2] Brunel Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Coll Engn Design & Phys Sci, London UB8 3PH, England
关键词
vulnerability assessment; road network fragility functions; vulnerability index; accessibility index; link importance index; resilient infrastructure; cities disaster risk reduction; 1999; CHI-CHI; HIGHWAY BRIDGES; TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE; RESILIENCE ASSESSMENT; FRAGILITY ASSESSMENT; NATURAL DISASTERS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; ACCESSIBILITY; EARTHQUAKE; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.3390/su13010061
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Road networks are considered as one of the most important transport infrastructure systems, since they attain the economic and social prosperity of modern societies. For this reason, it is vital to improve the resiliency of road networks in order to function normally under daily stressors and recover quickly after natural disasters such as an earthquake event. In the last decades, vulnerability assessment studies for road networks and their assets gained great attention among the research community. This literature review includes a brief introduction about seismic vulnerability assessment, followed by the roadway assets damage and their damage states, and then the main typologies for the vulnerability assessment of roadway assets. Moreover, it focuses on available assessment methods, which were proposed to quantify the vulnerability of road networks and its assets. These methods are divided into two main categories, physical and traffic-based approaches. Methods based on fragility functions and vulnerability indexes were investigated in physical approach for roadways and its assets. On the other hand, accessibility and link importance index were explored in traffic-based approach for road networks. This paper reviews and comments the most common vulnerability assessment methods for road networks and its assets and points out their advantages and disadvantages. The main gaps and needs are identified and recommendations for future studies are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:31
相关论文
共 177 条
[1]   Monitoring of transport infrastructure exposed to multiple hazards: a roadmap for building resilience [J].
Achillopoulou, Dimitra V. ;
Mitoulis, Stergios A. ;
Argyroudis, Sotirios A. ;
Wang, Ying .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 746 (746)
[2]   Seismic vulnerability classification of roads [J].
Adafer, Sonia ;
Bensaibi, Mahmoud .
MATERIALS & ENERGY I (2015) / MATERIALS & ENERGY II (2016), 2017, 139 :624-630
[3]  
Alamanis N., 2017, AM SCI RES J ENG TEC, V35, P95
[4]   Assessing Resilience of Urban Critical Infrastructure Networks: A Case Study of Ahvaz, Iran [J].
Alizadeh, Hadi ;
Sharifi, Ayyoob .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (09)
[5]  
Allen J., 2014, London Freight Data Report: 2014 Update
[6]  
Allen J., 2018, Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, V53, P262, DOI 10.3138/cart.53.4.2018-0013
[7]   Classification of road damage due to earthquakes [J].
Anbazhagan, Panjamani ;
Srinivas, Sushma ;
Chandran, Deepu .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 60 (02) :425-460
[8]   Use of fragility curves to assess the seismic vulnerability in the risk analysis of mountain tunnels [J].
Andreotti, G. ;
Lai, C. G. .
TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 91
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Highway Economics Requirements System Technical Report DOT
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ENCY EARTHQUAKE ENG