Discrete Event Simulation for Decision Modeling in Health Care: Lessons from Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening

被引:21
作者
Glover, Matthew J. [1 ]
Jones, Edmund [2 ]
Masconi, Katya L. [2 ]
Sweeting, Michael J. [2 ]
Thompson, Simon G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ London, Hlth Econ Res Grp, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, Middx, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cardiovasc Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge, Cambs, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
abdominal aortic aneurysm; decision analytic model; discrete event simulation; Markov model; screening; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; SURVEILLANCE INTERVALS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; TECHNOLOGIES; METAANALYSIS; FREQUENCY; ENGLAND; PROGRAM; RUPTURE; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X17753380
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Markov models are often used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of new healthcare interventions but they are sometimes not flexible enough to allow accurate modeling or investigation of alternative scenarios and policies. A Markov model previously demonstrated that a one-off invitation to screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) for men aged 65 y in the UK and subsequent follow-up of identified AAAs was likely to be highly cost-effective at thresholds commonly adopted in the UK (20,000 pound to 30,000 pound per quality adjusted life-year). However, new evidence has emerged and the decision problem has evolved to include exploration of the circumstances under which AAA screening may be cost-effective, which the Markov model is not easily able to address. A new model to handle this more complex decision problem was needed, and the case of AAA screening thus provides an illustration of the relative merits of Markov models and discrete event simulation (DES) models. An individual-level DES model was built using the R programming language to reflect possible events and pathways of individuals invited to screening v. those not invited. The model was validated against key events and cost-effectiveness, as observed in a large, randomized trial. Different screening protocol scenarios were investigated to demonstrate the flexibility of the DES. The case of AAA screening highlights the benefits of DES, particularly in the context of screening studies.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 451
页数:13
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], INT LIF TABL ENGL WA
  • [2] The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial
    Ashton, HA
    Buxton, MJ
    Day, NE
    Kim, LG
    Marteau, TM
    Scott, RAP
    Thomspon, SG
    Walker, NM
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 360 (9345) : 1531 - 1539
  • [3] Barton Pelham, 2004, J Health Serv Res Policy, V9, P110, DOI 10.1258/135581904322987535
  • [4] International Update on Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Issues and Opportunities
    Bjorck, M.
    Bown, M. J.
    Choke, E.
    Earnshaw, J.
    Florenes, T.
    Glover, M.
    Kay, M.
    Laukontaus, S.
    Lees, T.
    Lindholt, J.
    Powell, J. T.
    van Rij, A.
    Svensjo, S.
    Wanhainen, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 49 (02) : 113 - 115
  • [5] Surveillance Intervals for Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms A Meta-analysis
    Bown, Matthew J.
    Sweeting, Michael J.
    Brown, Louise C.
    Powell, Janet T.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 309 (08): : 806 - 813
  • [6] A taxonomy of model structures for economic evaluation of health technologies
    Brennan, Alan
    Chick, Stephen E.
    Davies, Ruth
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 15 (12) : 1295 - 1310
  • [7] An introduction to Markov modelling for economic evaluation
    Briggs, A
    Sculpher, M
    [J]. PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 13 (04) : 397 - 409
  • [8] Buxton MJ, 1997, HEALTH ECON, V6, P217, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199705)6:3<217::AID-HEC267>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-W
  • [10] Discrete Event Simulation: The Preferred Technique for Health Economic Evaluations?
    Caro, Jaime J.
    Moeller, Joergen
    Getsios, Denis
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (08) : 1056 - 1060