Does Activity Limitation Predict Discharge Destination for Postacute Care Patients?

被引:11
作者
Chang, Feng-Hang [1 ]
Ni, Pengsheng [1 ]
Jette, Alan M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Hlth & Disabil Res Inst, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
Discharge Destination; Rehabilitation; Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve; International Classification of Functioning; Disability and Health; BERG BALANCE SCALE; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; STROKE REHABILITATION; OUTCOMES; HOME;
D O I
10.1097/PHM.0000000000000097
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to examine the ability of different domains of activity limitation to predict discharge destination (home vs. nonhome settings) 1 mo after hospital discharge for postacute rehabilitation patients. Design: A secondary analysis was conducted using a data set of 518 adults with neurologic, lower extremity orthopedic, and complex medical conditions followed after discharge from a hospital into postacute care. Variables collected at baseline include activity limitations (basic mobility, daily activity, and applied cognitive function, measured by the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care), demographics, diagnosis, and cognitive status. The discharge destination was recorded at 1 mo after being discharged from the hospital. Results: Correlational analyses revealed that the 1-mo discharge destination was correlated with two domains of activity (basic mobility and daily activity) and cognitive status. However, multiple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that basic mobility functioning performed the best in discriminating home vs. nonhome living. Conclusions: This study supported the evidence that basic mobility functioning is a critical determinant of discharge home for postacute rehabilitation patients. The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care-basic mobility showed good usability in discriminating home vs. nonhome living. The findings shed light on the importance of basic mobility functioning in the discharge planning process.
引用
收藏
页码:782 / 790
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Is patient-reported function reliable for monitoring postacute outcomes? [J].
Andres, PL ;
Haley, SM ;
Ni, PS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2003, 82 (08) :614-621
[2]  
Andrich D, 1998, RASH MODELS MEASUREM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, ICF INT CLASFUNCT
[4]   Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves [J].
Bewick, V ;
Cheek, L ;
Ball, J .
CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (06) :508-512
[5]   Usefulness of the berg balance scale in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review [J].
Blum, Lisa ;
Korner-Bitensky, Nicol .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 88 (05) :559-566
[6]   Prediction of discharge destination after stroke using the motor assessment scale on admission: A prospective, multisite study [J].
Brauer, Sandra G. ;
Bew, Paul G. ;
Kuys, Suzanne S. ;
Lynch, Mary R. ;
Morrison, Greg .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (06) :1061-1065
[7]   A multi-centre European study of factors affecting the discharge destination of older people admitted to hospital: analysis of in-hospital data from the ACMEplus project [J].
Campbell, SE ;
Seymour, DG ;
Primrose, WR ;
Lynch, JE ;
Dunstan, E ;
Espallargues, M ;
Lamura, G ;
Lawson, P ;
Philp, I ;
Mestheneos, E ;
Politynska, B ;
Raiha, I .
AGE AND AGEING, 2005, 34 (05) :467-475
[8]   Predictors of entry to the nursing home: Does length of follow-up matter? [J].
Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska ;
Wirtz, Philip W. .
ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2011, 53 (03) :309-315
[9]   Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings [J].
Coster, WJ ;
Haley, SM ;
Jette, AM .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (04) :237-242
[10]   Factors That Predict Acute Hospitalization Discharge Disposition for Adults With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury [J].
Cuthbert, Jeffrey P. ;
Corrigan, John D. ;
Harrison-Felix, Cynthia ;
Coronado, Victor ;
Dijkers, Marcel P. ;
Heinemann, Allen W. ;
Whiteneck, Gale G. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2011, 92 (05) :721-730