On generation-integrated energy storage

被引：31

作者：

Garvey, S. D. ^{[1
]}

Eames, P. C. ^{[2
]}

Wang, J. H. ^{[3
]}

Pimm, A. J. ^{[1
]}

Waterson, M. ^{[3
]}

MacKay, R. S. ^{[3
]}

Giulietti, M. ^{[3
]}

Flatley, L. C. ^{[3
]}

Thomson, M. ^{[2
]}

Barton, J. ^{[2
]}

Evans, D. J. ^{[4
]}

Busby, J. ^{[4
]}

Garvey, J. E. ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England

[2] Univ Loughborough, Loughborough, Leics, England

[3] Univ Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England

[4] British Geol Survey, Nottingham, England

[5] Univ Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England

来源：

ENERGY POLICY | 2015年 / 86卷

基金：

英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;

关键词：

Energy storage; Incentives; Renewable energy; Balancing;

D O I：

10.1016/j.enpol.2015.08.001

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Generation-integrated energy storage (GIES) systems store energy at some point along the transformation between the primary energy form and electricity. Instances exist already in natural hydro power, biomass generation, wave power, and concentrated solar power. GIES systems have been proposed for wind, nuclear power and they arise naturally in photocatalysis systems that are in development. GIES systems can compare very favourably in both performance and total cost against equivalent non-integrated systems comprising both generation and storage. Despite this, they have not hitherto been recognised as a discrete class of systems. Consequently policy decisions affecting development or demonstration projects and policy approaches concerning low-carbon generation are not fully informed. This paper highlights that policy structures exist militating against the development and introduction of GIES systems-probably to the detriment of overall system good. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

引用

页码：544 / 551

页数：8

共 24 条

[1] Modelling generation and infrastructure requirements for transition pathways [J].