Regularized discriminant analysis for breast mass detection on full field digital mammograms

被引:0
作者
Wei, Jun [1 ]
Sahiner, Berkman [1 ]
Zhang, Yiheng [1 ]
Chan, Heang-Ping [1 ]
Hadjiiski, Lubomir M. [1 ]
Zhou, Chuan [1 ]
Ge, Jun [1 ]
Wu, Yi-Ta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
MEDICAL IMAGING 2006: IMAGE PROCESSING, PTS 1-3 | 2006年 / 6144卷
关键词
computer-aided detection; full field digital mammogram; mass detection; regularized discriminant analysis; feature selection;
D O I
10.1117/12.654897
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
in computer-aided detection (CAD) applications, an important step is to design a classifier for the differentiation of the abnormal from the normal structures. We have previously developed a stepwise linear discriminant analysis (LDA) method with simplex optimization for this purpose. In this study, our goal was to investigate the performance of a regularized discriminant analysis (RDA) classifier in combination with a feature selection method for classification of the masses and normal tissues detected on full field digital mammograms (FFDM). The feature selection scheme combined a forward stepwise feature selection process and a backward stepwise feature elimination process to obtain the best feature subset. An RDA classifier and an LDA classifier in combination with this new feature selection method were compared to an LDA classifier with stepwise feature selection. A data set of 130 patients containing 260 mammograms; with 130 biopsy-proven masses was used. All cases had two mammographic views. The true locations of the masses were identified by experienced radiologists. To evaluate the performance of the classifiers, we randomly divided the data set into two independent sets of approximately equal size for training and testing. The training and testing were performed using the 2-fold cross validation method. The detection performance of the CAD system was assessed by free response receiver operating characteristic (FROC) analysis. The average test FROC curve was obtained by averaging the FP rates at the same sensitivity along the two corresponding test FROC curves from the 2-fold cross validation. At the case-based sensitivities of 90%, 80% and 70% on the test set, our RDA classifier with the new feature selection scheme achieved an FP rate of 1.8, 1.1, and 0.6 FPs/image, respectively, compared to 2.1, 1.4, and 0.8 FPs/image with stepwise LDA with simplex optimization. Our results indicate that RDA in combination with the sequential forward inclusion-backward elimination feature selection method can improve the performance of mass detection on mammograms. Further work is underway to optimize the feature selection and classification scheme and to evaluate if this approach can be generalized to other CAD classification tasks.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
*AM CANC SOC, 2004, STAT 2004
[2]   Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting [J].
Birdwell, RL ;
Bandodkar, P ;
Ikeda, DM .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 236 (02) :451-457
[3]   THE LAPLACIAN PYRAMID AS A COMPACT IMAGE CODE [J].
BURT, PJ ;
ADELSON, EH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, 1983, 31 (04) :532-540
[4]  
Cady B, 2001, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V91, P1699, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010501)91:9<1699::AID-CNCR1186>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-W
[6]   COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC MICROCALCIFICATIONS - PATTERN-RECOGNITION WITH AN ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK [J].
CHAN, HP ;
LO, SCB ;
SAHINER, B ;
LAM, KL ;
HELVIE, MA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (10) :1555-1567
[7]   Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: Effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers [J].
Chan, HP ;
Sahiner, B ;
Wagner, RF ;
Petrick, N .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (12) :2654-2668
[8]   Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience [J].
Destounis, SV ;
DiNitto, P ;
Logan-Young, W ;
Bonaccio, E ;
Zuley, ML ;
Willison, KM .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (02) :578-584
[9]   American College of Radiology guidelines for breast cancer screening [J].
Feig, SA ;
D'Orsi, CJ ;
Hendrick, RE ;
Jackson, VP ;
Kopans, DB ;
Monsees, B ;
Sickles, EA ;
Stelling, CB ;
Zinninger, M ;
Wilcox-Buchalla, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (01) :29-33
[10]   Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: Prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center [J].
Freer, TW ;
Ulissey, MJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 220 (03) :781-786