A scoping review of reporting 'Ethical Research Practices' in research conducted among refugees and war-affected populations in the Arab world

被引:19
作者
Makhoul, Jihad [1 ]
Chehab, Rana F. [2 ]
Shaito, Zahraa [3 ]
Sibai, Abla M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Promot & Community Hlth, Beirut, Lebanon
[2] Purdue Univ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[3] Amer Univ Beirut, Reg External Programs, Beirut, Lebanon
[4] Amer Univ Beirut, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Beirut, Lebanon
关键词
Ethics; Research; IRB; Refugees; War-affected populations; Review; Arab world; NORTH-AFRICA; NO HARM;
D O I
10.1186/s12910-018-0277-2
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Ethical research conduct is a cornerstone of research practice particularly when research participants include vulnerable populations. This study mapped the extent of reporting ethical research practices in studies conducted among refugees and war-affected populations in the Arab World, and assessed variations by time, country of study, and study characteristics. Methods: An electronic search of eight databases resulted in 5668 unique records published between 2000 and 2013. Scoping review yielded 164 eligible articles for analyses. Results: Ethical research practices, including obtaining institutional approval, access to the community/research site, and informed consent/assent from the research participants, were reported in 48.2, 54.9, and 53.7% of the publications, respectively. Institutional approval was significantly more likely to be reported when the research was biomedical in nature compared to public health and social (91.7% vs. 54.4 and 32.4%), when the study employed quantitative compared to qualitative or mixed methodologies (61.7% vs. 26.8 and 42.9%), and when the journal required a statement on ethical declarations (57.4% vs. 27.1%). Institutional approval was least likely to be reported in papers that were sole-authored (9.5%), when these did not mention a funding source (29.6%), or when published in national journals (0%). Similar results were obtained for access to the community site and for seeking informed consent/assent from study participants. Conclusions: The responsibility of inadequacies in adherence to ethical research conduct in crisis settings is born by a multitude of stakeholders including funding agencies, institutional research boards, researchers and international relief organizations involved in research, as well as journal editors, all of whom need to play a more proactive role for enhancing the practice of ethical research conduct in conflict settings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Review of national research ethics regulations and guidelines in Middle Eastern Arab countries [J].
Alahmad, Ghiath ;
Al-Jumah, Mohammad ;
Dierickx, Kris .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2012, 13
[2]   Human Rights Research and Ethics Review: Protecting Individuals or Protecting the State? [J].
Amon, Joseph J. ;
Baral, Stefan D. ;
Beyrer, Chris ;
Kass, Nancy .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2012, 9 (10)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The fundamental principles of the Red Cross and Red Crescent
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ASIAN BIOETHICS REV
[5]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616
[6]  
Belhekar Mahesh N, 2014, Perspect Clin Res, V5, P129, DOI 10.4103/2229-3485.134316
[7]  
Bin Tareef A., 2009, Journal of Instructional Psychology, V36, P158
[8]   Ethical codes in humanitarian emergencies: From practice to research? [J].
Black, R .
DISASTERS, 2003, 27 (02) :95-108
[9]  
Blanchet K, 2013, TECHNICAL REPORT
[10]  
Bucaille Laetitia., 2006, Growing Up Palestinian: Israeli Occupation and the Intifada Generation