Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Genetic Testing: Psychological Impact

被引:3
作者
Martins, Raquel Gomes [1 ,2 ]
Carvalho, Irene Palmares [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Sch Med, Dept Clin Neurosci & Mental Hlth, Med Psychol Unit, Porto, Portugal
[2] Dept Endocrinol, Portuguese Oncol Inst Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Sch Med, CINTESIS, Porto, Portugal
关键词
pheochromocytoma; paraganglioma; hereditary cancer syndrome; genetic testing; risk assessment; CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY; BRCA1/2; MUTATION; OVARIAN-CANCER; DISTRESS; WOMEN; DISCLOSURE; DEPRESSION; ANXIETY; BREAST;
D O I
10.1037/hea0000993
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Genetic testing is recommended for all pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma tumor-affected patients and, if positive, for their relatives, who are at risk of developing tumors. This study aims to assess the previously unexamined psychological impact of genetic testing and identify factors associated with this impact. Method: A nationwide sample of 103 individuals carrying succinate dehydrogenase mutations answered the Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire plus two measures of general well-being (the SF-36 Health Survey and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale). Sociodemographic, clinical, and personality characteristics (the 5 personality factors and locus of control) were also assessed. Data were analyzed with bivariate and GLM univariate analyses. Results: Genetic testing-related mean scores were 6.12 for Distress, 11.58 for Uncertainty, 10.61 for Positive experiences, and almost 30% of the sample displayed high MICRA global suffering. Tumor-affected participants whose neoplasia was identified through presymptomatic screening felt that the genetic test has made it easier to cope with their disease. Significant aspects associated with genetic-testing-related Distress and Uncertainty included higher levels of Neuroticism and Agreeableness. An interaction between having the neoplasia and having children was also associated with higher levels of Distress. Education and Conscientiousness were associated with Positive experiences. Affected mutation carriers presented lower global quality of life and higher anxiety and depression levels than healthy mutation carriers. Conclusions: Genetic testing's impact depends on individual characteristics. The identified characteristics can inform clinical practice regarding who might benefit from special care in genetic counseling.
引用
收藏
页码:934 / 943
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1992, J Pers, V60, P175
  • [2] Genetic testing for hereditary melanoma and pancreatic cancer: a longitudinal study of psychological outcome
    Aspinwall, Lisa G.
    Taber, Jennifer M.
    Leaf, Samantha L.
    Kohlmann, Wendy
    Leachman, Sancy A.
    [J]. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 (02) : 276 - 289
  • [3] The Trajectory of Psychological Impact in BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing: Does Time Heal?
    Beran, Tammy M.
    Stanton, Annette L.
    Kwan, Lorna
    Seldon, Joyce
    Bower, Julienne E.
    Vodermaier, Andrea
    Ganz, Patricia A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (02) : 107 - 116
  • [4] Bertoquini V., 2006, Psychologica, V43, P193
  • [5] Psychological distress related to BRCA testing in ovarian cancer patients
    Bjornslett, Merete
    Dahl, Alv A.
    Sorebo, Oystein
    Dorum, Anne
    [J]. FAMILIAL CANCER, 2015, 14 (04) : 495 - 504
  • [6] Bonadona V, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P97
  • [7] Psychosocial aspects of genetic testing
    Cameron, Linda D.
    Muller, Cecile
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 22 (02) : 218 - 223
  • [8] A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: The Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire
    Cella, D
    Hughes, C
    Peterman, A
    Chang, CH
    Peshkin, BN
    Schwartz, MD
    Wenzel, L
    Lemke, A
    Marcus, AC
    Lerman, C
    [J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 21 (06) : 564 - 572
  • [9] The who, when, and why of primary adrenal malignancies: Insights into the epidemiology of a rare clinical entity
    Chandrasekar, Thenappan
    Goldberg, Hanan
    Klaassen, Zachary
    Wallis, Christopher J. D.
    Woon, Dixon T. S.
    Herrera-Caceres, Jaime O.
    Kulkarni, Girish S.
    Fleshner, Neil E.
    [J]. CANCER, 2019, 125 (07) : 1050 - 1059
  • [10] Costa PT., 2008, The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R), V2, P179, DOI [10.4135/9781849200479.n9, 10.4135/9781849200479, DOI 10.4135/9781849200479.N9]