Deep Learning and Handcrafted Method Fusion: Higher Diagnostic Accuracy for Melanoma Dermoscopy Images

被引:129
作者
Hagerty, Jason R. [1 ]
Stanley, R. Joe [2 ]
Almubarak, Haidar A. [2 ]
Lama, Norsang [2 ]
Kasmi, Reda [3 ]
Guo, Peng [2 ]
Drugge, Rhett J. [4 ]
Rabinovitz, Harold S. [5 ]
Oliviero, Margaret [5 ]
Stoecker, William V. [1 ]
机构
[1] S&A Technol, Rolla, MO 65401 USA
[2] Missouri Univ Sci & Technol, Rolla, MO 65209 USA
[3] Univ Bejaia, Bejaia 06000, Algeria
[4] Sheard & Drugge, Stamford, CT 06902 USA
[5] Plantation Skin & Canc Associates, Plantation, FL 33324 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Melanoma; dermoscopy; deep learning; classifier; transfer learning; LESION SEGMENTATION; SKIN-LESIONS; CLASSIFICATION; ALGORITHMS; CHALLENGE; TEXTURE; AREAS;
D O I
10.1109/JBHI.2019.2891049
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents an approach that combines conventional image processing with deep learning by fusing the features from the individual techniques. We hypothesize that the two techniques, with different error profiles, are synergistic. The conventional image processing arm uses three handcrafted biologically inspired image processing modules and one clinical information module. The image processing modules detect lesion features comparable to clinical dermoscopy information-atypical pigment network, color distribution, and blood vessels. The clinical module includes information submitted to the pathologist-patient age, gender, lesion location, size, and patient history. The deep learning arm utilizes knowledge transfer via a ResNet-50 network that is repurposed to predict the probability of melanoma classification. The classification scores of each individual module from both processing arms are then ensembled utilizing logistic regression to predict an overall melanoma probability. Using cross-validated results of melanoma classification measured by area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), classification accuracy of 0.94 was obtained for the fusion technique. In comparison, the ResNet-50 deep learning based classifier alone yields an AUC of 0.87 and conventional image processing based classifier yields an AUC of 0.90. Further study of fusion of conventional image processing techniques and deep learning is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1385 / 1391
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] A generalized framework for medical image classification and recognition
    Abedini, M.
    Codella, N. C. F.
    Connell, J. H.
    Garnavi, R.
    Merler, M.
    Pankanti, S.
    Smith, J. R.
    Syeda-Mahmood, T.
    [J]. IBM JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 59 (2-3)
  • [2] [Anonymous], LEARNING FROM DATA
  • [3] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [4] [Anonymous], PROC CVPR IEEE
  • [5] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [6] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [7] [Anonymous], DERMAKNET INCORPORAT
  • [8] Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions - Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-Point checklist based on pattern analysis
    Argenziano, G
    Fabbrocini, G
    Carli, P
    De Giorgi, V
    Sammarco, E
    Delfino, M
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 134 (12) : 1563 - 1570
  • [9] The significance of multiple blue-grey dots (granularity) for the dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma
    Braun, R. P.
    Gaide, O.
    Oliviero, M.
    Kopf, A. W.
    French, L. E.
    Saurat, J.-H.
    Rabinovitz, H. S.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 157 (05) : 907 - 913
  • [10] Pattern analysis: A two-step procedure for the dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma
    Braun, RP
    Rabinovitz, HS
    Oliviero, M
    Kopf, AW
    Saurat, JH
    [J]. CLINICS IN DERMATOLOGY, 2002, 20 (03) : 236 - 239