Systematic failure of the Woods-Saxon nuclear potential to describe both fusion and elastic scattering: Possible need for a new dynamical approach to fusion

被引:243
作者
Newton, JO [1 ]
Butt, RD
Dasgupta, M
Hinde, DJ
Gontchar, II
Morton, CR
Hagino, K
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Phys Sci & Engn, Dept Nucl Phys, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
[2] Kyoto Univ, Yukawa Inst Theoret Phys, Kyoto 6068502, Japan
[3] Omsk State Transport Univ, RU-644046 Omsk, Russia
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW C | 2004年 / 70卷 / 02期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevC.70.024605
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
A large number of precision fusion excitation functions, at energies above the average fusion barriers, have been fitted using the Woods-Saxon form for the nuclear potential in a barrier passing model of fusion. They give values for the empirical diffuseness parameter a ranging between 0.75 and 1.5 fm, compared with values of about 0.65 fm which generally reproduce elastic scattering data. There is a clear tendency for the deduced a to increase strongly with the reaction charge product Z(1)Z(2), and some evidence for the effect of nuclear structure on the value of a, particularly with regard to the degree of neutron richness of the fusing nuclei, and possibly with regard to deformation. The measured fusion-barrier energies are always lower than those of the bare potentials used, which is expected as a result of adiabatic coupling to high energy collective states. This difference increases with increasing Z(1)Z(2) and calculations show that about 1/3 of it may be attributed to coupling to the isoscalar giant-quadrupole resonances in the target and projectile. Coupling to all giant resonances may account for a significant part. Fluctuations about the trend line may be due to systematic errors in the data and/or structure effects such as coupling to collective octupole states. Previously suggested reasons for the large values of a have been related to departures from the Woods-Saxon potential and to dissipative effects. This work suggests that the apparently large values of a may be an artifact of trying to describe the dynamical fusion process by use of a static potential. Another partial explaination might reside in fusion inhibition, due for example to deep-inelastic scattering, again a process requiring dynamical calculations.
引用
收藏
页码:024605 / 1
页数:15
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   Cross sections and average angular momenta in the fusion of Si-28+Mo-94,Mo-100 and Ni-58,Ni-64+Ni-64 [J].
Ackermann, D ;
Bednarczyk, P ;
Corradi, L ;
Napoli, DR ;
Petrache, CM ;
Spolaore, P ;
Stefanini, AM ;
Varier, KM ;
Zhang, H ;
Scarlassara, F ;
Beghini, S ;
Montagnoli, G ;
Muller, L ;
Segato, GF ;
Soramel, F ;
Signorini, C .
NUCLEAR PHYSICS A, 1996, 609 (01) :91-107
[2]  
Akyuz O., 1981, NUCL STRUCTURE HEAVY
[3]   ANGULAR-DISTRIBUTIONS IN HEAVY-ION-INDUCED FISSION [J].
BACK, BB ;
BETTS, RR ;
GINDLER, JE ;
WILKINS, BD ;
SAINI, S ;
TSANG, MB ;
GELBKE, CK ;
LYNCH, WG ;
MCMAHAN, MA ;
BAISDEN, PA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1985, 32 (01) :195-213
[4]   NEAR-BARRIER AND SUB-BARRIER FUSION OF NI-58 WITH NI-58 [J].
BECKERMAN, M ;
BALL, J ;
ENGE, H ;
SALOMAA, M ;
SPERDUTO, A ;
GAZES, S ;
DIRIENZO, A ;
MOLITORIS, JD .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1981, 23 (04) :1581-1589
[5]  
BEMIS CE, 1986, UNPUB ORNL PROGR REP
[6]   Unexpected inhibition of fusion in nucleus-nucleus collisions [J].
Berriman, AC ;
Hinde, DJ ;
Dasgupta, M ;
Morton, CR ;
Butt, RD ;
Newton, JO .
NATURE, 2001, 413 (6852) :144-147
[7]  
BERRIMAN AC, 2001, THESIS AUSTR NATL U
[8]   Fusion barrier distributions for heavy ion systems involving prolate and oblate target nuclei [J].
Bierman, JD ;
Chan, P ;
Liang, JF ;
Kelly, MP ;
Sonzogni, AA ;
Vandenbosch, R .
PHYSICAL REVIEW C, 1996, 54 (06) :3068-3075
[9]  
BLOCKI J, 1977, ANN PHYS-NEW YORK, V105, P427, DOI 10.1016/0003-4916(77)90249-4
[10]  
BOHR A, 1975, NUCL STRUCTURE, V2, P139