Roles of microtubules, cell polarity and adhesion in electric-field-mediated motility of 3T3 fibroblasts

被引:74
作者
Finkelstein, E
Chang, W
Chao, PHG
Gruber, D
Minden, A
Hung, CT
Bulinski, JC [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Biol Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Pathol, Coll Arts & Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Coll Phys & Surg, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Sch Engn & Appl Sci, Dept Biomed Engn, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
electric field; cell motility; microtubule; adhesion;
D O I
10.1242/jcs.00986
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Direct-current electric fields mediate motility (galvanotaxis) of many cell types. In 3T3 fibroblasts, electric fields increased the proportion, speed and cathodal directionality of motile cells. Analogous to fibroblasts' spontaneous migration, we initially hypothesized that reorientation of microtubule components modulates galvanotaxis. However, cells with intact microtubules did not reorient them in the field and cells without microtubules still migrated, albeit slowly, thus disproving the hypothesis. We next proposed that, in monolayers wounded and placed in an electric field, reorientation of microtubule organizing centers and stable, detyrosinated microtubules towards the wound edge is necessary and/or sufficient for migration. This hypothesis was negated because field exposure mediated migration of unoriented, cathode-facing cells and curtailed migration of oriented, anode-facing cells. This led us to propose that ablating microtubule detyrosination would not affect galvanotaxis. Surprisingly, preventing microtublule detyrosination increased motility speed, suggesting that detyrosination inhibits galvanotaxis. Microtubules might enhance adhesion/de-adhesion remodeling during galvanotaxis; thus, electric fields might more effectively mediate motility of cells poorly or dynamically attached to substrata. Consistent with this hypothesis, incompletely spread cells migrated more rapidly than fully spread cells. Also, overexpression of PAK4, a Cdc42-activated kinase that decreases adhesion, enhanced galvanotaxis speed, whereas its lack decreased speed. Thus, electric fields mediate fibroblast migration via participation of microtubules and adhesive components, but their participation differs from that during spontaneous motility.
引用
收藏
页码:1533 / 1545
页数:13
相关论文
共 85 条
[21]   EMBRYONIC FIBROBLAST MOTILITY AND ORIENTATION CAN BE INFLUENCED BY PHYSIOLOGICAL ELECTRIC-FIELDS [J].
ERICKSON, CA ;
NUCCITELLI, R .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1984, 98 (01) :296-307
[22]   Integrin-mediated activation of Cdc42 controls cell polarity in migrating astrocytes through PKCζ [J].
Etienne-Manneville, S ;
Hall, A .
CELL, 2001, 106 (04) :489-498
[23]   PERSISTENT, DIRECTIONAL MOTILITY OF CELLS AND CYTOPLASMIC FRAGMENTS IN THE ABSENCE OF MICROTUBULES [J].
EUTENEUER, U ;
SCHLIWA, M .
NATURE, 1984, 310 (5972) :58-61
[24]   Rho family proteins in cell adhesion and cell migration [J].
Evers, EE ;
Zondag, GCM ;
Malliri, A ;
Price, LS ;
ten Klooster, JP ;
van der Kammen, RA ;
Collard, JG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 36 (10) :1269-1274
[25]   Migration of human keratinocytes in electric fields requires growth factors and extracellular calcium [J].
Fang, KS ;
Farboud, B ;
Nuccitelli, R ;
Isseroff, RR .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 111 (05) :751-756
[26]   OSTEOCLASTS AND OSTEOBLASTS MIGRATE IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS IN RESPONSE TO A CONSTANT ELECTRICAL-FIELD [J].
FERRIER, J ;
ROSS, SM ;
KANEHISA, J ;
AUBIN, JE .
JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY, 1986, 129 (03) :283-288
[27]  
Gaffney EA, 1999, IMA J MATH APPL MED, V16, P369
[28]   EFFECT OF COLCEMID ON FIBROBLAST MOTILITY [J].
GAIL, MH ;
BOONE, CW .
EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH, 1971, 65 (01) :221-&
[29]   Keratocytes pull with similar forces on their dorsal and ventral surfaces [J].
Galbraith, CG ;
Sheetz, MP .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1999, 147 (06) :1313-1323
[30]   Transmembrane extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton crosstalk [J].
Geiger, B ;
Bershadsky, A ;
Pankov, R ;
Yamada, KM .
NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2001, 2 (11) :793-805