Tomographic ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor: which levels matter most?

被引:95
|
作者
Dietz, H. P. [1 ]
Shek, K. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Nepean Clin Sch, Penrith, NSW 2750, Australia
关键词
birth trauma; levator avulsion; pelvic floor; prolapse; three-dimensional ultrasound; tomographic ultrasound; LEVATOR ANI; PUBOVISCERAL MUSCLE; ORGAN PROLAPSE; WOMEN; ABNORMALITIES; AVULSION; BIOMETRY; TRAUMA; HIATUS;
D O I
10.1002/uog.6403
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives Tomographic ultrasound imaging has greatly simplified pelvic floor assessment. Abnormalities of the insertion of the levator ani can be documented in a single frame. In this study we aimed to determine which levels of the levator hiatus are associated with alterations in ultrasound parameters of pelvic organ support. Methods This was a subanalysis of a study conducted in 296 women seen before and after their first delivery. We analyzed postpartum changes in bladder neck descent and hiatal area as indicators of altered pelvic organ support. Tomographic ultrasound examination was performed on volumes obtained at maximal pelvic floor muscle contraction, at 2.5-mm slice intervals, from 5 mm below to 12.5 mm above the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. Results Two hundred and eight recruits (70%) returned for a postnatal appointment. Of these, 130 bad delivered vaginally and 26 (20%) were diagnosed with an avulsion injury. An abnormality in slices 3-8 was associated with increased bladder neck descent postpartum (P = 0.038 to P = 0.001) and increased hiatal area on Valsalva maneuver (P = 0.029 to P < 0.001). This was not the case for the two most distal slices. Conclusions We found no association between levator ani defects observed on tomographic ultrasound imaging below the plane of minimal hiatal dimensions and indices of increased hiatal distension or bladder neck descent on Valsalva maneuver. This implies that defects observed below this plane are either irrelevant for pelvic organ support or artifactual. Copyright (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:698 / 703
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tomographic ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor in nulliparous pregnant women: limits of normality
    Adisuroso, T.
    Shek, K. L.
    Dietz, H. P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (06) : 698 - 703
  • [3] Methodology for the transperineal ultrasound imaging of the pelvic floor
    Garcia-Mejido, J. A.
    Bonomi-Barby, M. J.
    Armijo-Sanchez, A.
    Borrero-Fernandez, C.
    Castro-Portillo, L.
    Vargas-Broquetas, M.
    Canadas-Granados, M.
    Sainz-Bueno, J. A.
    CLINICA E INVESTIGACION EN GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2021, 48 (02): : 190 - 195
  • [4] Pelvic floor ultrasound in prolapse: what's in it for the surgeon?
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2011, 22 (10) : 1221 - 1232
  • [5] Pelvic floor trauma: does the second baby matter?
    Horak, T. A.
    Guzman-Rojas, R. A.
    Shek, K. L. L.
    Dietz, H. P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 44 (01) : 90 - 94
  • [6] Ultrasound Imaging of the Pelvic Floor
    Stone, Daniel E.
    Quiroz, Lieschen H.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 43 (01) : 141 - +
  • [7] The use of 3-dimensional ultrasound of the pelvic floor to predict recurrence risk after pelvic reconstructive surgery
    Rodrigo, Natassia
    Wong, Vivien
    Shek, Ka Lai
    Martin, Andrew
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 54 (03) : 206 - 211
  • [8] Pelvic floor ultrasound: a review
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 202 (04) : 321 - 334
  • [9] Pelvic Floor Ultrasound: A Review
    Dietz, Hans Peter
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 60 (01) : 58 - 81
  • [10] Is curved three-dimensional ultrasound reconstruction needed to assess the warped pelvic floor plane?
    Youssef, A.
    Cavalera, M.
    Pacella, G.
    Salsi, G.
    Morganelli, G.
    Montaguti, E.
    Cataneo, I.
    Pilu, G.
    Rizzo, N.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (03) : 388 - 394