Optimizing patient education of oncology medications: A quantitative analysis of the patient perspective

被引:5
作者
Kaupp, Kristin [1 ]
Scott, Samantha [1 ]
Minard, Laura V. [1 ]
Lambourne, Tessa [2 ]
机构
[1] Nova Scotia Hlth Author Cent Zone, QEII Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pharm, Halifax, NS, Canada
[2] Aberdeen Reg Hosp, Nova Scotia Hlth Author Northern Zone, Dept Pharm, New Glasgow, NS, Canada
关键词
Oncology; medication education; patient education; patient perspective; SERVICE QUALITY; CANCER; SATISFACTION; INFORMATION; EXPERIENCE; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; NEEDS; CARE;
D O I
10.1177/1078155219843675
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background With the ever-increasing complexity of cancer treatments, oncology medication patient education is becoming a progressively important component of cancer care. Despite this, cancer patients frequently report that they receive inadequate information and feel that their education needs have not been met. Objective To explore patients' perspectives of optimal oncology medication education across Nova Scotia. Methods This was a descriptive survey of adult medical, hematological and gynaecological oncology outpatients receiving intravenous chemotherapy within the Nova Scotia Health Authority between January 26 and April 30, 2018. Results One hundred forty-two responses were included; 41% and 47% of respondents reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their oncology medication education, respectively; 30% and 43% of respondents would like the opportunity to receive education or follow-up from a hospital pharmacist, respectively. Respondents with post-secondary education were found to have 2.82 higher odds of wanting to make an appointment for education with a hospital pharmacist. Conclusions Patients were generally satisfied with their oncology medication education despite the majority not receiving education from a hospital pharmacist. Patients with a higher level of formal education were more likely to want the opportunity to schedule an appointment for education with and/or receive follow-up from a hospital pharmacist. The oncology medication education participants received in the past appeared to align with their education preferences. Findings from this research can be used to optimize the limited time healthcare professionals have to provide meaningful and effective oncology medication patient education and improve patient-centered care.
引用
收藏
页码:1445 / 1455
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, CAN CANC STAT 2017
[2]  
[Anonymous], STAND PRACT ONC PHAR
[3]  
Avery Mia, 2015, J Pharm Pract, V28, P26, DOI 10.1177/0897190014562382
[4]  
Carrington CV, 2014, ASIA-PAC J CLIN ONCO, V10, P143
[5]   The effects of pharmacist interventions on adult outpatients with cancer: A systematic review [J].
Colombo, L. R. P. ;
Aguiar, P. M. ;
Lima, T. M. ;
Storpirtis, S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2017, 42 (04) :414-424
[6]   Task allocation in cancer medication management - Integrating the pharmacist [J].
Doehler, Nele ;
Krolop, Linda ;
Ringsdorf, Susanne ;
Meier, Klaus ;
Ko, Yon-Dschun ;
Kuhn, Walther ;
Schwalbe, Oliver ;
Jaehde, Ulrich .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2011, 83 (03) :367-374
[7]   Optimizing patient education of oncology medications: A descriptive survey of pharmacist-provided patient education in Canada [J].
Donald, Gillian ;
Scott, Samantha ;
Broadfield, Larry ;
Harding, Claudia ;
Meade, Andrea .
JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (02) :295-302
[8]   Patients' satisfaction and importance ratings of quality in an outpatient oncology center [J].
Gourdji, I ;
McVey, L ;
Loiselle, C .
JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2003, 18 (01) :43-55
[9]   Patient satisfaction with service quality as a predictor of survival outcomes in breast cancer [J].
Gupta, Digant ;
Rodeghier, Mark ;
Lis, Christopher G. .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2014, 22 (01) :129-134
[10]   Patient satisfaction with service quality in an oncology setting: implications for prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Gupta, Digant ;
Rodeghier, Mark ;
Lis, Christopher G. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2013, 25 (06) :696-703