A revealed reference point for prospect theory

被引:33
作者
Werner, Katarzyna M. [1 ]
Zank, Horst [2 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Metropolitan Univ, Manchester, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Econ, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Probability midpoint; Prospect theory; Rank-dependence; Reference point; Sign-dependence; PARAMETER-FREE ELICITATION; EXPECTED UTILITY; PROBABILITY-PREFERENCES; NONEXPECTED UTILITY; DEPENDENT UTILITY; LOSS AVERSION; RISK; DECISION; CHOICE; DISAPPOINTMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00199-017-1096-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Without an instrument to identify the reference point, prospect theory includes a degree of freedom that makes the model difficult to falsify. To address this issue, we propose a foundation for prospect theory that advances existing approaches with three innovations. First, the reference point is not known a priori; if preferences are reference-dependent, the reference point is revealed from behavior. Second, the key preference axiom is formulated as a consistency property for attitudes toward probabilities; it entails both a revealed preference test for reference-dependence and a tool suitable for empirical measurement. Third, minimal assumptions are imposed for outcomes, thereby extending the model to general settings. By incorporating these three features we deliver general foundations for prospect theory that show how reference points can be identified and how the model can be falsified.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 773
页数:43
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Equilibrium Notions for Agents with Cumulative Prospect Theory Preferences [J].
Keskin, Kerim .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2016, 13 (03) :192-208
[22]   An elicitation of utility for quality of life under prospect theory [J].
Attema, Arthur E. ;
Brouwer, Werner B. F. ;
l'Haridon, Olivier ;
Luis Pinto, Jose .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 48 :121-134
[23]   Prospect theory and corporate bond returns: An empirical study [J].
Zhong, Xiaoling ;
Wang, Junbo .
JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL FINANCE, 2018, 47 :25-48
[24]   Reference-Point Theory: An Account of Individual Differences in Risk Preferences [J].
Mellers, Barbara A. ;
Yin, Siyuan .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2025, 20 (01) :99-114
[25]   Evolutionary stability of prospect theory preferences [J].
Rieger, Marc Oliver .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 50 :1-11
[26]   Prospect Theory Explains Newsvendor Behavior: The Role of Reference Points [J].
Long, Xiaoyang ;
Nasiry, Javad .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 61 (12) :3009-3012
[27]   The predictive validity of prospect theory versus expected utility in health utility measurement [J].
Maria Abellan-Perpinan, Jose ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Luis Pinto-Prades, Jose .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2009, 28 (06) :1039-1047
[28]   Does Prospect Theory Explain the Disposition Effect? [J].
Hens, Thorsten ;
Vlcek, Martin .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2011, 12 (03) :141-157
[29]   Composition rules in original and cumulative prospect theory [J].
Gonzalez, Richard ;
Wu, George .
THEORY AND DECISION, 2022, 92 (3-4) :647-675
[30]   Accommodating stake effects under prospect theory [J].
Bouchouicha, Ranoua ;
Vieider, Ferdinand M. .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2017, 55 (01) :1-28