Democracy and empowerment

被引:27
作者
Sorensen, E
机构
[1] Department of Social Sciences, Roskilde University
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9299.00074
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The article argues that institutions of parliamentary democracy are currently being undermined and calls for the development of new means of democratic empowerment. The meaning of 'democratic empowerment' differs sharply depending on whether one refers to a predominantly aggregative, or a predominantly integrative strategy of empowerment. The article seeks to clarify the phrase. For a predominantly aggregative strategy of empowerment, as proposed by Paul Hirst, the primary means of empowerment is exit. For a predominantly integrative strategy of empowerment, proposed by David Burns, Robin Hambleton and Paul Hoggett the primary means of empowerment is voice. The article concludes that a democratic strategy of empowerment must aim to balance exit and voice options. An example of how balance could be institutionalized is found in Denmark.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 567
页数:15
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN J, 1990, DEMOKRATI UDEN PARTI
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1946, LIBERTY CONSIDERATIO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, MODELS DEMOCRACY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1975, LEGITIMATIONSPROBLEM
[5]  
BANG H, 1983, HEGEMONY DEMOCRACY
[6]  
Barber Benjamin., 1984, Strong Democracy
[7]  
Berlin Isaiah., 2002, LIBERTY INCORPORATIN
[8]  
BOGASON P, 1995, POLITICA, V1, P5
[9]  
Burns Danny, 1994, POLITICS DECENTRALIS
[10]  
Dahl RobertAlan., 1989, Democracy and its Critics