RETRACTED: Randomized, double-blind comparison of subhypnotic- dose propofol alone and combined with dexamethasone for emesis in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery (Retracted article. See vol. 40, pg. 1048, 2018)

被引:11
作者
Fujii, Y [1 ]
Numazaki, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tsukuba, Grad Sch Comprehens Human Sci, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
关键词
vomiting; antiemetic; propofol; dexamethasone; cesarean delivery;
D O I
10.1016/S0149-2918(04)80129-2
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Nausea, retching, and vomiting are common in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery performed under regional anesthesia. Subhypnotic-dose propofol 1.0 mg/kg per hour has been used to reduce the incidence of these emetic symptoms. Dexamethasone has been shown to reduce chemotherapy-induced emesis when added to an antiemetic regimen. Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the difference in efficacy and tolerability between subhypnotic-dose propofol 1.0 mg/kg per hour alone and combined with dexamethasone 8 mg for reducing postdelivery emetic episodes in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind trial, parturients received IV placebo (saline) or dexamethasone 8 mg followed by a continuous infusion of propofol at subhypnotic dose (1.0 mg/kg per hour) immediately after clamping of the umbilical cord. Intraoperative, postdelivery emetic episodes and safety assessments were performed by an investigator. Results: One hundred twenty parturients (mean [SD] age, 29 [5] years; age range, 21-38 years; mean [SD] height, 158 [7] cm; height range, 145-172 cm; mean [SD] body weight, 72 [8] kg; weight range, 54-90 kg) were enrolled in the study, 60 in each treatment group. The treatment groups were comparable with respect to maternal demographics and operative management. The rate of emetic symptoms (nausea, retching, and vomiting) in an intraoperative, postdelivery period was lower in patients who received the combination regimen than in those who received subhypnotic-dose propofol 1.0 mg/kg per hour alone (5% [3/60] vs 20% [12/60], respectively; P = 0.012). No clinically important adverse events attributable to the study drug were observed in either group. Conclusion: In the parturients undergoing cesarean delivery performed under spinal anesthesia in this study, the combination of subhypnotic-dose propofol 1.0 mg/kg per hour and dexamethasone 8 mg was more effective than propofol alone for reducing the incidence of postdelivery emetic symptoms. (Clin Ther. 2004;26:1286-1291) Copyright (C) 2004 Excerpta Medica, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1286 / 1291
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] AAPRO MS, 1981, NEW ENGL J MED, V305, P520
  • [2] BORGEAT A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P539
  • [3] Cechetto DF, 2001, ANESTH ANALG, V92, P934
  • [4] METHOD OF EPHEDRINE ADMINISTRATION AND NAUSEA AND HYPOTENSION DURING SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION
    DATTA, S
    ALPER, MH
    OSTHEIMER, GW
    WEISS, JB
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1982, 56 (01) : 68 - 70
  • [5] FLEISHER LA, 1996, CLIN ANESTH, P443
  • [6] Small doses of propofol, droperidol, and metoclopramide for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after thyroidectomy
    Fujii, Y
    Tanaka, H
    Kobayashi, N
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2001, 124 (03) : 266 - 269
  • [7] Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting:: A quantitative systematic review
    Henzi, I
    Walder, B
    Tramèr, MR
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (01) : 186 - 194
  • [8] 5-HT3 receptor antagonists vs traditional agents for the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Loewen, PS
    Marra, CA
    Zed, PJ
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2000, 47 (10): : 1008 - 1018
  • [9] LUSSOS SA, 1992, REGION ANESTH, V17, P126
  • [10] MCCORMICK CG, 2002, ASA NEWSL, V66, P19