Do institutional investors monitor management? Evidence from the relationship between institutional ownership and capital structure

被引:40
作者
Chung, Chune Young [1 ]
Wang, Kainan [2 ]
机构
[1] Chung Ang Univ, Sch Business Adm, Seoul 156756, South Korea
[2] Univ Toledo, Coll Business & Innovat, Dept Finance, Toledo, OH 43606 USA
关键词
Corporate governance; Institutional monitoring; Heterogeneous institutions; Capital structure; Suboptimal leverage; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM; CROSS-SECTION; AGENCY COSTS; CASH FLOW; FIRMS; DECISIONS; LIQUIDITY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.najef.2014.10.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine the dynamic relations between institutional ownership and a firm's capital structure. We find that a firm's leverage decreases when institutional ownership increases. This result implies that a firm reduces its debt level as institutional investors substitute for the monitoring role of debt. More importantly, we find that a firm's suboptimal leverage decreases when the institutional ownership increases, and institutional ownership decreases when a firm's suboptimal leverage increases. This finding shows that institutions not only effectively monitor a firm's capital structure but they also passively sell their shares when dissatisfied with it. In addition, we find that the monitoring evidence on a firm's leverage and suboptimal leverage are more pronounced when the institutional investors are less likely to have business relationships with a firm or the information asymmetry is high in the market. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 233
页数:31
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Active institutional shareholders and costs of monitoring: Evidence from executive compensation [J].
Almazan, A ;
Hartzell, JC ;
Starks, LT .
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 34 (04) :5-34
[2]   Market timing and capital structure [J].
Baker, M ;
Wurgler, J .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2002, 57 (01) :1-32
[3]   Greener pastures and the impact of dynamic institutional preferences [J].
Bennett, JA ;
Sias, RW ;
Starks, LT .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2003, 16 (04) :1203-1238
[4]  
BHIDE A, 1994, HARVARD BUS REV, V72, P128
[5]   OWNERSHIP STRUCTURE AND VOTING ON ANTITAKEOVER AMENDMENTS [J].
BRICKLEY, JA ;
LEASE, RC ;
SMITH, CW .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1988, 20 (1-2) :267-291
[6]   Have individual stocks become more volatile? An empirical exploration of idiosyncratic risk [J].
Campbell, JY ;
Lettau, M ;
Malkiel, BG ;
Xu, YX .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2001, 56 (01) :1-43
[7]   The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: Evidence from TIAA-CREF [J].
Carleton, WT ;
Nelson, JM ;
Weisbach, MS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1998, 53 (04) :1335-1362
[8]   Does bank relationship matter for corporate risk-taking? Evidence from listed firms in Taiwan [J].
Chan, Chia-Chung ;
Lin, Bing-Huei ;
Chang, Yung-Ho ;
Liao, Wei-Chen .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2013, 26 :323-338
[9]   Institutional monitoring and opportunistic earnings management [J].
Chung, R ;
Firth, M ;
Kim, JB .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2002, 8 (01) :29-48
[10]   LIQUIDITY VERSUS CONTROL - THE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTOR AS CORPORATE MONITOR [J].
COFFEE, JC .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1991, 91 (06) :1277-1368