Formal systems for persuasion dialogue

被引:171
作者
Prakken, Henry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Ctr Law & ICT,Fac Law, Univ Groningen, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0269888906000865
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article reviews formal systems that regulate persuasion dialogues. In such dialogues two or more participants aim to resolve a difference of opinion, each trying to persuade the other participants to adopt their point of view. Systems for persuasion dialogue have found application in various fields of computer science, such as non-monotonic logic, artificial intelligence and law, multi-agent systems, intelligent tutoring and computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Taking a game-theoretic view on dialogue systems, this review proposes a formal specification of the main elements of dialogue systems for persuasion and then uses it to critically review some of the main formal systems for persuasion. The focus of this review will be on regulating the interaction between agents rather than on the design and behaviour of individual agents within a dialogue.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 188
页数:26
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Alexy Robert, 1978, THEORIE JURISTISCHEN
[2]   A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments [J].
Amgoud, L ;
Cayrol, C .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 34 (1-3) :197-215
[3]   Modelling dialogues using argumentation [J].
Amgoud, L ;
Maudet, N ;
Parsons, S .
FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, :31-38
[4]   TECHNIQUES OF DISPUTATION IN HISTORY OF LOGIC [J].
ANGELELLI, I .
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1970, 67 (20) :800-815
[5]  
ARTIKIS A, 2003, P 9 INT C ART INT LA, P1
[6]   A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action [J].
Atkinson, K ;
Bench-Capon, T ;
Mcburney, P .
AUTONOMOUS AGENTS AND MULTI-AGENT SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (02) :153-171
[7]  
Barwise J, 1996, CSLI LECT NOTES, V60
[8]   A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games [J].
T. J. M. Bench-Capon ;
T. Geldard ;
P.H. Leng .
Artificial Intelligence and Law, 2000, 8 (2-3) :233-254
[9]  
BENCHCAPON TJM, 1998, LEGAL KNOWLEDGE BASE, P5
[10]   Dynamic argument systems: A formal model of argumentation processes based on situation calculus [J].
Brewka, G .
JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2001, 11 (02) :257-282