Population Estimation Methods for Free-Ranging Dogs: A Systematic Review

被引:36
作者
Belo, Vincius Silva [1 ,3 ]
Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro [2 ]
da Silva, Eduardo Sergio [3 ]
Barbosa, David Soeiro [1 ]
Struchiner, Claudio Jose [1 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz, Dept Endemias Samuel Pessoa, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Dept Epidemiol, Inst Med Social, BR-20550011 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Sao Joao del Rei, Divinopolis, MG, Brazil
来源
PLOS ONE | 2015年 / 10卷 / 12期
关键词
JOLLY-SEBER MODEL; STRAY DOGS; CANINE POPULATIONS; ABUNDANCE; SIZE; PARAMETERS; MANAGEMENT; DYNAMICS; ECOLOGY; DENSITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0144830
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The understanding of the structure of free-roaming dog populations is of extreme importance for the planning and monitoring of populational control strategies and animal welfare. The methods used to estimate the abundance of this group of dogs are more complex than the ones used with domiciled owned dogs. In this systematic review, we analyze the techniques and the results obtained in studies that seek to estimate the size of free-ranging dog populations. Twenty-six studies were reviewed regarding the quality of execution and their capacity to generate valid estimates. Seven of the eight publications that take a simple count of the animal population did not consider the different probabilities of animal detection; only one study used methods based on distances; twelve relied on capture-recapture models for closed populations without considering heterogeneities in capture probabilities; six studies applied their own methods with different potential and limitations. Potential sources of bias in the studies were related to the inadequate description or implementation of animal capturing or viewing procedures and to inadequacies in the identification and registration of dogs. Thus, there was a predominance of estimates with low validity. Abundance and density estimates carried high variability, and all studies identified a greater number of male dogs. We point to enhancements necessary for the implementation of future studies and to potential updates and revisions to the recommendations of the World Health Organization with respect to the estimation of free-ranging dog populations.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Aiyedun J. O., 2012, Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences, V10, P22, DOI 10.4314/sokjvs.v10i1.5
[2]  
Alves AJS, 2013, CONTINUOUS ED J VET, V11, P32
[3]   Dynamics and Control of Stray Dog Populations [J].
Amaku, Marcos ;
Dias, Ricardo Augusto ;
Ferreira, Fernando .
MATHEMATICAL POPULATION STUDIES, 2010, 17 (02) :69-78
[4]  
Amstrup SC, 2005, HANDBOOK OF CAPTURE-RECAPTURE ANALYSIS, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Conservation of Wildlife Populations: Demography, genetics, and management
[6]  
ARTOIS M, 1986, COMP IMMUNOL MICROB, V9, P4
[7]   Abundance and Survival of Pacific Humpback Whales in a Proposed Critical Habitat Area [J].
Ashe, Erin ;
Wray, Janie ;
Picard, Christopher R. ;
Williams, Rob .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09)
[8]  
Beck A., 1973, The Ecology of Stray Dogs. A Study Of Free-ranging Urban Animals
[9]   A systematic review and meta-analysis of the factors associated with Leishmania infantum infection in dogs in Brazil [J].
Belo, Vinicius Silva ;
Struchiner, Claudio Jose ;
Werneck, Guilherme Loureiro ;
Barbosa, David Soeiro ;
de Oliveira, Robson Bruniera ;
Teixeira Neto, Rafael Goncalves ;
da Silva, Eduardo Sergio .
VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY, 2013, 195 (1-2) :1-13
[10]   Assessing demographic and epidemiologic parameters of rural dog populations in India during mass vaccination campaigns [J].
Belsare, Aniruddha V. ;
Gompper, Matthew E. .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2013, 111 (1-2) :139-146