Gender difference with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: From pVAD Working Group

被引:5
作者
Doshi, Rajkumar [1 ]
Singh, Avneet [1 ]
Jauhar, Rajiv [1 ]
Meraj, Perwaiz M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Zucker Sch Med Hofstra Northwell, North Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Northwell Hlth, Hempstead, NY USA
关键词
High-risk PCI; percutaneous left ventricle assist device; gender disparities; MULTI-VESSEL DISEASE; ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; BYPASS GRAFT-SURGERY; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; IMPELLA; 2.5; CARDIOGENIC-SHOCK; INCOMPLETE REVASCULARIZATION; ONLY REVASCULARIZATION; HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1177/2048872617745790
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The interventional treatment of complex high-risk indicated patients is technically difficult and can result in poor outcomes. Thus, percutaneous left ventricular assist devices are being increasingly used to provide hemodynamic support. No data is available comparing male and female for Complex High-risk Indicated Patients treated with percutaneous left ventricular assist devices. Our goal was to evaluate in-hospital as well as short term outcomes comparing males and females. Methods: There were 160 complex high-risk indicated patients with percutaneous left ventricular assist device use who were not in cardiogenic shock. A total of 132 male and 28 female patients were included. Ejection fraction below 35% with one additional criterion such as use of atherectomy device or treatment on unprotected left main disease or multi-vessel disease were our inclusion criteria. An Impella 2.5 or Impella CP (Abiomed Inc.) device was used as a left ventricular support device. Results: There was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the genders after performing a propensity score matched analysis (8.3% vs. 12.5%, p=0.54). Secondary outcomes of myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, congestive heart failure, dysrhythmia, major adverse cardiac events and composite of all complications were higher in males. Furthermore, 30-day survival was similar in males and females (88.9% vs. 87.5%, p=0.31). In addition, worse complications rates and survival were noted in patients with incomplete revascularization compared with those patients with complete revascularization in both gender. Conclusion: This study demonstrated no gender difference in clinical outcomes when using percutaneous left ventricular assist device support for the treatment of complex high-risk indicated patients. Overall, males had higher secondary outcomes compared with females with no difference in in-hospital mortality or 30-day survival rates.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 378
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Complete versus incomplete revascularization with drug-eluting stents for multi-vessel disease in stable, unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis
    Ando, Tomo
    Takagi, Hisato
    Grines, Cindy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 30 (04) : 309 - 317
  • [2] Incomplete Revascularization in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention When Enough Is Enough
    Ayalon, Nir
    Jacobs, Alice K.
    [J]. JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 9 (03) : 216 - 218
  • [3] Becher T, 2017, EUR HEART J-ACUTE CA, DOI [10.1177/2048872617717687., DOI 10.1177/2048872617717687.]
  • [4] Female gender is an independent predictor of operative mortality after coronary artery bypass graft surgery - Contemporary analysis of 31 Midwestern hospitals
    Blankstein, R
    Ward, RP
    Arnsdorf, M
    Jones, B
    Lou, YB
    Pine, M
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (09) : I323 - I327
  • [5] Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
    Briasoulis, Alexandros
    Telila, Tesfaye
    Palla, Mohan
    Mercado, Nestor
    Kondur, Ashok
    Grines, Cindy
    Schreiber, Theodore
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 118 (03) : 369 - 375
  • [6] A randomized multicenter clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the TandemHeart percutaneous ventricular assist device versus conventional therapy with intraaortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock
    Burkhoff, Daniel
    Cohen, Howard
    Brunckhorst, Corinna
    O'Neill, William W.
    [J]. AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2006, 152 (03) : 469.e1 - 469.e8
  • [7] Complete versus culprit-only revascularization in patients with multi-vessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Huo, Tianyao
    Mahmoud, Ahmed
    Bavry, Anthony A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 186 : 98 - 103
  • [8] Hemodynamic Support With a Microaxial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella) Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
    Flaherty, Michael P.
    Pant, Sadip
    Patel, Samir V.
    Kilgore, Tyler
    Dassanayaka, Sujith
    Loughran, John H.
    Rawasia, Wasiq
    Dawn, Buddhadeb
    Cheng, Allen
    Bartoli, Carlo R.
    [J]. CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2017, 120 (04) : 692 - 700
  • [9] Optimal Timing of Complete Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gaffar, Rouan
    Habib, Bettina
    Filion, Kristian B.
    Reynier, Pauline
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (04):
  • [10] Randomized Trial of Complete Versus Lesion-Only Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for STEMI and Multivessel Disease
    Gershlick, Anthony H.
    Khan, Jamal Nasir
    Kelly, Damian J.
    Greenwood, John P.
    Sasikaran, Thiagarajah
    Curzen, Nick
    Blackman, Daniel J.
    Dalby, Miles
    Fairbrother, Kathryn L.
    Banya, Winston
    Wang, Duolao
    Flather, Marcus
    Hetherington, Simon L.
    Kelion, Andrew D.
    Talwar, Suneel
    Gunning, Mark
    Hall, Roger
    Swanton, Howard
    McCann, Gerry P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (10) : 963 - 972