Results of Phase 1 study on cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in men with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Yuh, Bertram E. [1 ]
Kwon, Young Suk [2 ,3 ]
Shinder, Brian M. [2 ,3 ]
Singer, Eric A. [2 ,3 ]
Jang, Thomas L. [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Sinae [4 ]
Stein, Mark N. [5 ]
Mayer, Tina [5 ]
Ferrari, Anna [5 ]
Lee, Nara [5 ]
Parikh, Rahul R. [6 ]
Ruel, Nora [1 ]
Kim, Wun-Jae [7 ]
Horie, Shigeo [8 ]
Byun, Seok-Soo [9 ]
Ahlering, Thomas E. [10 ]
Kim, Isaac Yi [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] City Hope Natl Med Ctr, Div Urol & Urol Oncol, 1500 E Duarte Rd, Duarte, CA 91010 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Sect Urol Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Div Urol, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[4] State Univ New Jersey, Rutgers Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[6] Rutgers State Univ, Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, Dept Radiat Oncol, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[7] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Dept Urol, Coll Med, Cheongju, South Korea
[8] Juntendo Univ, Dept Urol, Grad Sch Med, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Urol, Bundang Hosp, Bundang, South Korea
[10] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, Orange, CA 92668 USA
关键词
Cytoreduction; Clinical trial; Metastasis; Prostate cancer; ANDROGEN-DEPRIVATION; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; SURGERY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS; CONTINENCE; CARCINOMA; NADIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.prnil.2018.10.002
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Preclinical and retrospective data suggest that cytoreductive radical prostatectomy may benefit a subset of men who present with metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Herein, we report the results of the first planned Phase 1 study on cytoreductive surgery. Methods: From four institutions, 36 patients consented to the study. However, four did not complete surgery because of rapid disease progression (n = 3) and another because of an intraoperatively discovered pericolonic abscess. Men with newly diagnosed clinical mPCa to lymph nodes or bones were eligible. The primary endpoint was the rate of major perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade 3 or higher) occurring within 90 days of surgery. Results: The mean age at surgery was 64.0 years. The 90-day overall complication rate was 31.2% (n = 10), of which two (6.25%) were considered major complications: one acute tubular necrosis requiring temporary dialysis and one death. In men with more than 6 months of follow-up, 67.9% had prostate specific antigen nadir < 0.2 ng/mL, while one patient experienced a rapid rise inprostate specific antigen and another a widely disseminated disease that resulted in death 5 months after surgery. Altogether, these results demonstrate that cytoreductive radical prostatectomy is safe and surgically feasible in selected patients who present with mPCa. Yet, there may be a small subset of patients in whom surgery may cause a significant harm. Conclusion: Therefore, cytoreductive surgery in men with mPCa should be limited to clinical trials until robust data are available. (C) 2018 Asian Pacific Prostate Society, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in Men with Prostate Cancer and Skeletal Metastases
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Fossati, Nicola
    Pfister, David
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Shariat, Shahrokh
    Grubmueller, Bernhard
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2018, 1 (01): : 46 - 53
  • [2] The Role of Cytoreductive Radical Prostatectomy in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Low-volume Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Results from the Local Treatment of Metastatic Prostate Cancer (LoMP) Registry
    Lumen, Nicolaas
    De Bleser, Elise
    Buelens, Sarah
    Verla, Wesley
    Poelaert, Filip
    Claeys, Wietse
    Fonteyne, Valerie
    Verbeke, Sofie
    Villeirs, Geert
    De Man, Kathia
    Rottey, Sylvie
    Van Praet, Charles
    Decaestecker, Karel
    Ost, Piet
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2021, 29 : 68 - 76
  • [3] Radical cytoreductive prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer and oligometastatic disease
    Heidenreich, Axel
    Pfister, David
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 90 - 97
  • [4] Cytoreductive, radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer
    Chaloupka, M.
    Herlemann, A.
    Spek, A.
    Gratzke, C.
    Stief, C.
    UROLOGE, 2017, 56 (11): : 1430 - 1434
  • [5] Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy versus no local treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer
    Gonzalez-Browne, Catalina
    Diaz, Jorge
    Pinto, Ivan
    Recabal, Pedro
    Sandoval, Camilo
    Vidal, Alvaro
    Altamirano-Villarroel, Jaime
    MEDWAVE, 2023, 23 (04):
  • [6] Cytoreductive prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review
    Becker, Joachim Aidt
    Berg, Kasper Drimer
    Roder, Martin Andreas
    Brasso, Klaus
    Iversen, Peter
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 52 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [7] Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with minimal osseous metastases. Results of a first feasibility and case control study
    Heidenreich, A.
    Pfister, D.
    Brehmer, B.
    Porres, D.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (01): : 14 - 21
  • [8] Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with minimal osseous metastases. Results of a first feasibility and case control study
    Heidenreich, A.
    Pfister, D.
    Brehmer, B.
    Porres, D.
    UROLOGE, 2015, 54 (01): : 14 - 21
  • [9] Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in metastatic prostate cancer: Does it really make sense?
    Mathieu, Romain
    Korn, Stephan M.
    Bensalah, Karim
    Kramer, Gero
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (04) : 567 - 577
  • [10] Role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in men with oligometastatic prostate cancer on molecular imaging
    Robesti, Daniele
    Gallina, Andrea
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    Fossati, Nicola
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2024, 34 (04) : 294 - 299