A Systematic Review to Assess Resection Margin Status After Abdominoperineal Excision and Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer

被引:65
作者
Simillis, Constantinos [1 ,2 ]
Baird, Daniel L. H. [1 ,2 ]
Kontovounisios, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Pawa, Nikhil [1 ]
Brown, Gina [3 ]
Rasheed, Shahnawaz [1 ,2 ]
Tekkis, Paris P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Marsden Hosp, Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, London, England
[3] Royal Marsden Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
关键词
abdominoperineal excision; pelvic exenteration; rectal cancer; resection margin; survival; systematic review; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; ANTERIOR RESECTION; SURGICAL RESECTION; RADICAL RESECTION; SURGERY; SURVIVAL; METAANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000001963
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to assess resection margin status and its impact on survival after abdominoperineal excision and pelvic exenteration for primary or recurrent rectal cancer. Summary of Background Data: Resection margin is important to guide therapy and to evaluate patient prognosis. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to assess the impact of resection margin status on survival, and a regression analysis to analyze positive resection margin rates reported in the literature. Results: The analysis included 111 studies reporting on 19,607 participants after abdominoperineal excision, and 30 studies reporting on 1326 participants after pelvic exenteration. The positive resection margin rates for abdominoperineal excision were 14.7% and 24.0% for pelvic exenteration. The overall survival and disease-free survival rates were significantly worse for patients with positive compared with negative resection margins after abdominoperineal excision [hazard ratio (HR) 2.64, P < 0.01; HR 3.70, P < 0.01, respectively] and after pelvic exenteration (HR 2.23, P < 0.01; HR 2.93, P < 0.01, respectively). For patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision with positive resection margins, the reported tumor sites were 57% anterior, 15% posterior, 10% left or right lateral, 8% circumferential, 10% unspecified. A significant decrease in positive resection margin rates was identified over time for abdominoperineal excision. Although positive resection margin rates did not significantly change with the size of the study, some small size studies reported higher than expected positive resection margin rates. Conclusions: Resection margin status influences survival and a multidisciplinary approach in experienced centers may result in reduced positive resection margins. For advanced anterior rectal cancer, posterior pelvic exenteration instead of abdominoperineal excision may improve resection margins.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 299
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Efficacy of Pelvic Peritoneum Closure After Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer [J].
Yu Shen ;
Tinghan Yang ;
Hanjiang Zeng ;
Wenjian Meng ;
Ziqiang Wang .
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 :2668-2678
[42]   Perineal and Pelvic Anatomy of Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Cadaveric Dissection [J].
Acar, Halil Ibrahim ;
Kuzu, Mehmet Ayhan .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (09) :1179-1183
[43]   Deep Pelvic Anatomy Revisited for a Description of Crucial Steps in Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Rectal Cancer [J].
Stelzner, Sigmar ;
Holm, Torbjorn ;
Moran, Brendan J. ;
Heald, Richard J. ;
Witzigmann, Helmut ;
Zorenkov, Dimitri ;
Wedel, Thilo .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2011, 54 (08) :947-957
[44]   Pelvic exenteration and sacral resection for locally advanced. Primary and recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Yamada, K ;
Ishizawa, T ;
Niwa, K ;
Chuman, Y ;
Aikou, T .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2002, 45 (08) :1078-1084
[45]   Standard Versus Extralevator Abdominoperineal Low Rectal Cancer Excision Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
De Nardi, Paola ;
Summo, Valeria ;
Vignali, Andrea ;
Capretti, Giovanni .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 (09) :2997-3006
[46]   Early detection of deep pelvic surgical site infection by microdialysis after abdominoperineal resection for locally advanced rectal cancer [J].
Asvall, J. ;
Haugaa, H. ;
Larsen, S. G. ;
Skarholt, T. F. R. ;
Botnen, B. M. ;
Flatmark, K. ;
Tonnessen, T. I. ;
Thorgersen, E. B. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2025, 29 (01)
[47]   A low incidence of perineal hernia when using a biological mesh after extralevator abdominoperineal excision with or without pelvic exenteration or distal sacral resection in locally advanced rectal cancer patients [J].
Dijkstra, E. A. ;
Kahmann, N. L. E. ;
Hemmer, P. H. J. ;
Havenga, K. ;
van Etten, B. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (08) :855-861
[48]   The influence of the treatment response on the impact of resection margin status after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer [J].
Lee, Joo Ho ;
Chie, Eui Kyu ;
Kim, Kyubo ;
Jeong, Seung-Yong ;
Park, Kyu Joo ;
Park, Jae-Gahb ;
Kang, Gyeong Hoon ;
Han, Sae-Won ;
Oh, Do-Youn ;
Im, Seock-Ah ;
Kim, Tae-You ;
Bang, Yung-Jue ;
Ha, Sung W. .
BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
[49]   A systematic review of oncosurgical and quality of life outcomes following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer [J].
Maudsley, J. ;
Clifford, R. E. ;
Aziz, O. ;
Sutton, P. A. .
ANNALS OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS OF ENGLAND, 2025, 107 (01) :2-11
[50]   Quality of Life of Survivors After Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer [J].
Austin, Kirk K. S. ;
Young, Jane M. ;
Solomon, Michael J. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2010, 53 (08) :1121-1126